Obama is a fraud!

[mmj_uk]

This is just an example of the type of powers the US President now has as a result of 9/11 and the "War on Terrorism".

They must be using the Nazi playbook...

Burning of the Reichstag = 9/11
Patriot Act and others = Reichstag Fire Decree/Enabling Act

The Nazi's blamed the Reichstag fire on communists but were suspected at the time to have done it themselves (sound familiar?), it was a pivotal event in Hitler's rise to power.

The US President now has the power to declare Marshall Law and become a dictator overnight.

Do I believe Obama will be another Hitler? I have no idea but the stage is certainly set.

 

[Sankari]

It's martial law, not "Marshall".

 

[Meridian]

This is just an example of the type of powers the US President now has as a result of 9/11 and the "War on Terrorism".

They must be using the Nazi playbook...

Burning of the Reichstag = 9/11
Patriot Act and others = Reichstag Fire Decree/Enabling Act

The Nazi's blamed the Reichstag fire on communists but were suspected at the time to have done it themselves (sound familiar?), it was a pivotal event in Hitler's rise to power.

The US President now has the power to declare Marshall Law and become a dictator overnight.

Do I believe Obama will be another Hitler? I have no idea but the stage is certainly set.

Godwin's Law - you lose.


M

 

[Voltar]

magick if your name is Lawrence Allwood you should get in touch with your mates in London.

If not, get well soon after that flaming

 

[semi-pro waster]

He also speaks a lot of sense, so don't just focus on the lizards etc that the media like to:

Most people live a life restricted by their ego and fear of being seen to be different.

If someone believes that we are ruled by a secret cabal of lizards (although it has to be said they're not doing that great a job if he can discover them) then I fear it rathers casts doubt on his other beliefs. It isn't as if we're talking about someone saying that Red Dawn is a better Patrick Swayze film than Roadhouse - with that position they're clearly wrong but it doesn't mean they're looking about the World and seeing reptilian overlords.

Looking for other explanations to everyday events is fine, go for it and think as much as you can but that doesn't mean accepting every crackpot theory that comes along just because it is 'unconventional' and 'not what the man wants you to believe'. That doesn't make you far-sighted, it doesn't make you a freer thinker than anyone else, it makes you someone who is probably a bit gullible.

Godwin's Law - you lose.


M

Godwin's Law was invoked by the opening post unfortunately.

 

[magick]

If someone believes that we are ruled by a secret cabal of lizards (although it has to be said they're not doing that great a job if he can discover them) then I fear it rathers casts doubt on his other beliefs.

Does the same also apply to the mainstream media/governments/politicians that told us there WMDs in Iraq?

Regarding the reptillian thing, it's often trouted by those trying to discredit the conspiracy/truth movement. Reptillians make up about 5% of the topics David Icke talks about, though it's used to discredit everything him and also other conspiracy researchers who don't even believe the reptillian conspiracy because that people can laugh off very serious subjects like the US government commiting false flag operations, our central banks being privately held coporations and governments covertly acting in sinistar ways that don't benefit the masses.

For example recently ABC ran an article called "What's Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires?" and right at the beginning they mentioned David Icke and the reptillian conspiracy and then go on about how anyone who belives in conspiracies has mental issues. They mention nothing of Rothschilds secret empire that's at the center of almost all conspiracy beliefs.

Strange how ABC were quick to tell us Saddam Hussien was conspiring to build weapons of WMDs when it when in there interests and we should believe them.

The article failed at achieving it's effect anyway and people saw straight through another corporate media 'hitpiece' as you can see by reading the comments section.

Ok so maybe on ocuk forums most, though not all, people flame me when I make posts revealing what's going on. But it doesn't deter me as more and more people are opening there eyes to the bigger picture. When I go out in the real life and talk to people about these matters lots and lots of people can see what's going on and aware of the NWO. So don't all sit there on your high intellectual horses saying people like me are deluded minority because that isn't the case.

 

[Murf]

Ok so maybe on ocuk forums most, though not all, people flame me when I make posts revealing what's going on. But it doesn't deter me as more and more people are opening there eyes to the bigger picture. When I go out in the real life and talk to people about these matters lots and lots of people can see what's going on and aware of the NWO. So don't all sit there on your high intellectual horses saying people like me are deluded minority because that isn't the case.

Arrrrggggghhhhhhh!!!!!

 

[FTM]

David icke also claimed to be the sone of god and thought turqoise shell suits were worth wearing


to be honest anybody who thinks shell suits are a suitable item of clothing can say nothing that will make me believe they are of a sane mind



david icke - he's off his bike!

 

[magick]

Arrrrggggghhhhhhh!!!!!

Excuse me Murf, but you say i'm the most annoying person on the internet?

At least I have something to say. I don't recall hearing enlightening any posts from you.

 

[magick]

David icke also claimed to be the sone of god and thought turqoise shell suits were worth wearing

The son of god thing has been misinterperated a bit. He says everyone is 'the son of god' though the medias insatiable appetitie for one liners have distorted what he meant.

 

[MoNkeE]

Then you should have spent more time, and found one which proved your case.

Aiye, that's not Nixon at all, it's Jimmy Carr!

 

[Murf]

Excuse me Murf, but you say i'm the most annoying person on the internet?

At least I have something to say. I don't recall hearing enlightening posts from you.

And I don't recall reading any enlightening posts from you. Just dross.

The thing I take umbrage with most though is your inability to provide any evidence for your (sorry Icke's) claims. Your argument is basically "Well it's obvious, if you're enlightened like me" which is just plain daft.

 

[magick]

And I don't recall reading any enlightening posts from you. Just dross.

The thing I take umbrage with most though is your inability to provide any evidence for your (sorry Icke's) claims. Your argument is basically "Well it's obvious, if you're enlightened like me" which is just plain daft.

Proof for what exactly? There's pages upon pages of evidence out there covering various matters from UFOs to 9/11 to the rise of the Rothschilds and there control of world finance, media and government, but you seem of the mindset that if it's not on the 6 o'clock news then it's not happening which is a very deluded mindset.

 

[Jono8]

Does the same also apply to the mainstream media/governments/politicians that told us there WMDs in Iraq?

Regarding the reptillian thing, it's often trouted by those trying to discredit the conspiracy/truth movement. Reptillians make up about 5% of the topics David Icke talks about, though it's used to discredit everything him and also other conspiracy researchers who don't even believe the reptillian conspiracy because that people can laugh off very serious subjects like the US government commiting false flag operations, our central banks being privately held coporations and governments covertly acting in sinistar ways that don't benefit the masses.

For example recently ABC ran an article called "What's Behind Internet Conspiracy Empires?" and right at the beginning they mentioned David Icke and the reptillian conspiracy and then go on about how anyone who belives in conspiracies has mental issues. They mention nothing of Rothschilds secret empire that's at the center of almost all conspiracy beliefs.

Strange how ABC were quick to tell us Saddam Hussien was conspiring to build weapons of WMDs when it when in there interests and we should believe them.

The article failed at achieving it's effect anyway and people saw straight through another corporate media 'hitpiece' as you can see by reading the comments section.

Ok so maybe on ocuk forums most, though not all, people flame me when I make posts revealing what's going on. But it doesn't deter me as more and more people are opening there eyes to the bigger picture. When I go out in the real life and talk to people about these matters lots and lots of people can see what's going on and aware of the NWO. So don't all sit there on your high intellectual horses saying people like me are deluded minority because that isn't the case.

Surely this negates your whole arguement. If you are not in the deluded minority then surely their evil plans are not working and they have no control over the 'masses'.

 

[Sankari]

Does the same also apply to the mainstream media/governments/politicians that told us there WMDs in Iraq?

Actually, it was the mainstream media which helped to disprove the lie about WMD in Iraq. Just look at the work of Seymour Hersh, John Simpson, Robert Fisk, and John Pilger; all mainstream journalists who debunked the many lies surrounding the war.

Many politicians also rejected the claim of WDM in Iraq, resisted the war, and have since been vindicated.

Your problem is that you keep referring to groups like the media, governments, politicians etc. as if they are all one homogeneous mass (or several homogeneous masses) when in fact, they are all deeply divided along political and ideological lines. They don't all share the same position, they're not all in cahoots with each other, and they frequently break ranks with their own.

 

[Sankari]

Ok so maybe on ocuk forums most, though not all, people flame me when I make posts revealing what's going on.

No, you're flamed for claiming that you're revealing what's going on, yet consistently failing to prove it whilst (incredibly) claiming to be better informed than people whose ability to think in a straight line and employ basic logical principles is demonstrably superior to your own.

 

[Murf]

Proof for what exactly? There's pages upon pages of evidence out there covering various matters from UFOs to 9/11 to the rise of the Rothschilds and there control of world finance, media and government, but you seem of the mindset that if it's not on the 6 o'clock news then it's not happening which is a very deluded mindset.

Every time you post a link it basically reads something along the lines of "The Rothschilds control world finance because.... they do".

You just make accusations, lots of them, and outlandish ones to boot. I don't think in this day and age, especially with global communication through the internet that any secret organisation could hide their actions if they were as sinister and far reaching as you make out. The number of people that would have to be in collusion with each other, and all keep it secret for it to work is just too high.

It's far fetched fantasism, nothing more. Yes people have agendas. Yes they look out for their own interests. Of course politicians say what people want to hear to get elected and are backed by people who want that person in power. That's all common sense though and human nature. Beyond that pretty much everything you talk about is just rubbish and it doesn't take an 'enlightened' person to understand it. It takes someone with a grounding in common sense to reject it.

 

[Nitefly]

Surely this negates your whole arguement. If you are not in the deluded minority then surely their evil plans are not working and they have no control over the 'masses'.

You are just trying to be annoying, stop it.

 

[Jono8]

You are just trying to be annoying, stop it.

and succeeding, clearly.

 

[Sankari]

"Look out for these all these ancient, dangerous and mysteriously secret organisations, whose innermost plans are all inexplicably known by me, some random internet-using person!"

Well hey, that sounds credible.