I've been reading some interesting stats recently on the Essex Bike Safe Website.
Although it is often said that Bikes represent 1 percent of total traffic and 20 percent of deaths, if you actually take the number of accidents - as opposed to total traffic volume - the stats are much less disturbing.
Essentially, between 1999 and 2008, on average bikes were involved in only 10 percent higher rate of mortality than cars. That is, bikes represented 15 percent of accidents and of the fatalities within these accidents, accounted for about 25 percent.
This tells me that although bikes are disproportionately involved in an accident, the deaths from these accidents are not disproprotionately higher than in cars (only 10 percent).
Interesting as well, most riders were way above 25.
http://www.essex.police.uk/bikesafe/stats08.htm
And 125's seem to be involved in more serious injuries than bigger bikes, but with less fatalities overall.
Any decent stats from elsewhere anyone knows of? I find it quite interesting
Although it is often said that Bikes represent 1 percent of total traffic and 20 percent of deaths, if you actually take the number of accidents - as opposed to total traffic volume - the stats are much less disturbing.
Essentially, between 1999 and 2008, on average bikes were involved in only 10 percent higher rate of mortality than cars. That is, bikes represented 15 percent of accidents and of the fatalities within these accidents, accounted for about 25 percent.
This tells me that although bikes are disproportionately involved in an accident, the deaths from these accidents are not disproprotionately higher than in cars (only 10 percent).
Interesting as well, most riders were way above 25.
http://www.essex.police.uk/bikesafe/stats08.htm
And 125's seem to be involved in more serious injuries than bigger bikes, but with less fatalities overall.
Any decent stats from elsewhere anyone knows of? I find it quite interesting
