Associate
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 781
- Location
- UK, South coast
That explains much then.No. I invented photography and if I say it should be removed then removed it should be.
That explains much then.No. I invented photography and if I say it should be removed then removed it should be.
I don't think the eyes should be, otherwise the gun would be out of focus, and just a blur on her faceUnless you somehow got both in focus, but then the picture would just seem a bit flat, and lack the impact the DoF has on the OP's
It's good![]()
Posted by Sic Composition I like, but you should've removed her jewellery. Ring and necklace are getting on my nerves.
I like the ring. It opens up a story. She's clearly married, so who is she shooting? her husband? Crime of Passion? Ooooooh scandal.
Nice pic![]()
I dont mean to be rude guys but i disagree about the ring! I think it should remain. It adds a story to the picture and makes others like at it more! Its like who is she aiming the gun at and why? She could be engaged and sometimes gone wrong! There could be loads of things to think up and this adds a nice touch to this image! Do you see what i mean![]()