So she has drunk obviously, to become an alchololic. It's not as though she never drank to become one...
Of course. I thought that was obvious but maybe for some it wasn't.
So she has drunk obviously, to become an alchololic. It's not as though she never drank to become one...
Elaborate.
That's not what the shakes are dumbass. The shakes are when your nervous system si that ****ed up it's like that all the time you don't have a blood alcohol level.
I don't drink (I have done in the past, i.e. when I was at Uni) - does that mean I've now become untrustworthy?
Sounds like BS to me!![]()
that doesn't make any sense, as a alcoholic has a physical dependency on alcohol due to it;s effects on the nervous system (and others things). If they don;t have a physical need then they arn't physically addicted and as such not an alcoholic.
A true alcoholic would be risking death by going cold turkey for a month.
Staropramen? It seems a bit of a waste if you're just drinking that fine drink just to get drunk, I'm sure after the first four or five pints you could change to Carling and probably wouldn't notice the difference plus it would be cheaper.
To me its down to drinking LOTS fast. Thats the only way you can get past the 'i've drunk so much I feel ill stage' otherwise you pull a tactical and keep going



well i wont trust anyone until ive seen them absolutely smashed atleast twice, because when your drunk you dont really lie, not because you cant, and many times people tell you things they normally wouldnt etc etc...
im thinking they think if they get too drunk some info may slip, so they remain sober. obviously not everyone, i just wouldnt trust you until we are absolutely smashed and you begin telling me about this chick you couldnt bang because you were soo drunk... thats honesty!

thats true but staropramen is stronger, and carling is weaker, and 1% does make a diff, and the price is like 50p cheaper so thats no point.
Then you're getting ripped off for Carling I'd suggest, it's a poor substitute for a lager but my point was simply that if you're only drinking to get drunk then you're largely wasting your time with something that tastes good (and costs more) when you won't be tasting it. There is a vague argument about purity of alcohol and hangovers but it's somewhat dubious in my experience.
I'm worried about how many people have blackouts on here![]()
Blackouts? Blood? Fights?
Great bunch of outstanding people here![]()

I'm confused. By blackout you mean a large chunk of your evening appears to go missing, as opposed to actually passing out?
well i wont trust anyone until ive seen them absolutely smashed atleast twice, because when your drunk you dont really lie, not because you cant, and many times people tell you things they normally wouldnt etc etc...
