Then why the **** was he not kept in a controlled environment then if his illness is so unpredictable?
Autistic teenager kicked baby in the face
- Thread starter Mobius 1
- Start date
Then why the **** was he not kept in a controlled environment then if his illness is so unpredictable?
Probably because they didn't know he would do something like this, or that his condition was that bad.
It's not like they get a neat little print out with all the things he may do.
But again why use common sense when righteous indignation is so much more fun?
also, autistic people have a high pain threshold. if you were to punch someone with autism in the face they might say nothing more than "oww" where as most of us would feel the pain and go mental. they don't know what pain they are causing because they cant feel it themselves so they have no benchmark
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,720
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Now I am confused.
It is you that is claiming everybody is equal and theres no such thing as all of these conditions such as Aspergers, ADHD etc.
So do you now recognise that people are born differently?
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Sep 2007
- Posts
- 1,873
I wonder if you would be so understanding if it was your kids face he jumped on
Maybe he can't control his emotions in which case he should not be walking around in public without his lead .
autistic
Basically what used to be called 'a wierdo'.
Society needs to accept that people are different. I think a lot of so called 'special needs' and disabilities are rubbish.
Dsylexia for one. "Agh i put letters and words the wrong way round!"
TOUGH!
Are you stupid?
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 1,866
- Location
- Exeter, Devon
If you had any understanding of how little he cares for your opinion, you would have gone back to your organic peace crisps and fruitless charity donations long ago.
Can't be dealing with left-ite do-gooders. I can only assume that when you're so high up on that high horse the world as it is takes on some vastly different form for you. Why should someone with a supposed disability be given preferential treatment over those who are judged to be able bodied? Answer: they shouldn't. Jog on my friend, careful with all those steps on the way down though, eh?
Last edited:
I nearly wrote out the exact same response, but didn't bother due to his rubbish previous arguments such as "I am right in my eyes".
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2004
- Posts
- 1,866
- Location
- Exeter, Devon
did daddy hit you as a child? maybe on the head
Oooh, they don't like when people say something that goes against what they believe do they? Imagine how frustrated we get when we're expected to sift through the tripe you put about.
The debate here is over whether someone with a supposed disability should be exempt from liability for what would be seen as a fairly violent crime if committed by someone judged to be able bodied. You apparently think that that is a perfectly acceptable outcome. I don't.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,720
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
jono8's Mummy who is an expert should have also told her little boy that it takes an awfully long time to label people into these special little groups.
Some parents know for years that their little ones have a problem but the powers that be won't label them because of the money they will have to dish out.
Therefore if you are labelled then the authorities have accepted there is a 100% problem.
For example my mate has 2 sons who have dispraxia and he gets a total of £24,000 a year in payouts.
It took about 5 years to get the diagnosis.
My wife is an expert and her main problem is that parents won't accept that their children have a problem and fight the authorities to get them out of the special units.
HOWEVER, 4 years on the child could now be put back into mainstream because their problems have been overcome and the parents now won't accept it because they still want the payout from the Government.
Of course jono8's expert Mum will already know this.
Some parents know for years that their little ones have a problem but the powers that be won't label them because of the money they will have to dish out.
Therefore if you are labelled then the authorities have accepted there is a 100% problem.
For example my mate has 2 sons who have dispraxia and he gets a total of £24,000 a year in payouts.
It took about 5 years to get the diagnosis.
My wife is an expert and her main problem is that parents won't accept that their children have a problem and fight the authorities to get them out of the special units.
HOWEVER, 4 years on the child could now be put back into mainstream because their problems have been overcome and the parents now won't accept it because they still want the payout from the Government.
Of course jono8's expert Mum will already know this.
You haven't actually posted anything against anything you just spouted a bunch of old Clichés and vague insults...
I don't see what the police have to do with this? It is not the police who have made the decision not to charge the suspect. The police have done everything that they possibly could do, they have done exactly what their job is, they have investigated this incident.
It is the Crown Prosecution Service that do not wish to pursue the matter.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,720
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Lets hope you never have a car accident and you lose your legs so that your company has to let you go.
You decide that you could do your job 100% if they put a ramp in and changed the layout of your desk.
Your company says no because it means you are now getting preferential treatment.
I think you would be a tad upset.
It has taken this country decades to get to the point where hopefully everybody is treated equally and if that means there is a cost to it because people are so diverse then so be it.
Except now its gone to far the other way.
what you dont seem to understand is that i know considerably more about this disorder than you, if you know anything bout autism and care to use this knowledge to back up your post's then ill happily listen. from what i have seen all you are doing is forming a generic view that we should all get tarnised with the same brush wheather we be disabled, or not.
should we stop providing ramps, disabled carparks, big print letters etc? why should we go out of our way to see that these people are catered for?
if you knew anything about autism you would know that every day of that persons life is an ongoing battle, they already have a life sentence
also, if you knew anything about what happens when autistic people are put in jail, you would not be saying what you are
before you go spurting your mouth off try getting a bit of background on what you are talking about, maybe one day you or someone close to you may have kids that have a severe disability, maybe then you will take time to come off that high horse and think about other people's situations / feelings