Uk prisons needs reform

We should just chuck em all on an island and let them get on with it.

like battle royale or the rip off film "condemned"

they should be made to payback society through menial work. to breakeven the tax being paid for them to play playstation and watch desperate housewives while they bash
 
Why has the "SEND THEM BACK" mentality had a resurgance here? I thought that was what people worked to remove over the past few years?

What I never get is the death penalty requests.

The death penalty has been gone for 50+ years in this country and is known to not work as a deterrant.
 
But can you EVER have 100% evidence? I don't think so, which is why so many people are against it, because really you can never 100% prove something :/

I think it should at least be discussed in the House of Commons/Lords though.

Of course you can have 100% assurance the person you're putting to death is guilty.

DNA matches are so accurate they're in the region of 1 in a billionth that it isn't a match. Video surveillance is also going to be used if it was able to capture whatever crime it was.

If you're talking about cases we see in the paper where someone is released 25 years later after being falsely imprisoned, you'll find that it's due to new technologies we have to be able to narrow down to the right guy.

We're not quite at the level of "Minority Report" but you can convict with certainty nowadays.
 
we're in a day and age that science has advance so far that no one can be wrongly accused of a crime

This is wrong. Plenty of modern day cases can result in the wrong verdict being given by the jury.

Of course you can have 100% assurance the person you're putting to death is guilty.

DNA matches are so accurate they're in the region of 1 in a billionth that it isn't a match. Video surveillance is also going to be used if it was able to capture whatever crime it was.

If you're talking about cases we see in the paper where someone is released 25 years later after being falsely imprisoned, you'll find that it's due to new technologies we have to be able to narrow down to the right guy.

We're not quite at the level of "Minority Report" but you can convict with certainty nowadays.

Again, wrong.
 
what is a deterrent then playstation,sky, etc is certainly not.
you remember that story of the farmer that got burgled and shot the guy and end up going prison for protecting his property. the victims are made to feel like the criminals.
if we cant even protect our properties, what can we do

in america they have the law "make my day" if someone comes on your property.. you may do as you wish with them
 
we in a day and age that. science has advance so far. that no one can be wrongly accused of a crime. with all this dna testing etc.(light)

You can't be serious on that?

There's loads of contamination of evidence and several times when an appeal comes around the original evidence is "lost" by the police.

How does scientific evidence prove who punched who first for example.

There have also been a couple of convictions of assault on police in recent years in this country where a video has later surfaced of the incident actually being the police carrying out unprovoked attacks instead. And thats just what there are videos of.

What you're saying there isn't gonna happen until memories of both dead and alive people can be successfully read.
 
I believe that life should mean life. Not 25 years or so and then out in half the time for good behaviour.

So assuming you did that where is the incentive not to, I dunno, beat the crap out of wardens etc? Being let out early for good behaviour is what maintains order in most prisons.
 
[TW]Fox;13458150 said:
So assuming you did that where is the incentive not to, I dunno, beat the crap out of wardens etc? Being let out early for good behaviour is what maintains order in most prisons.

Fear would need to be the incentive. You start a fight with the wardens, expect to be in a chair for a few months.
 
[TW]Fox;13458150 said:
So assuming you did that where is the incentive not to, I dunno, beat the crap out of wardens etc? Being let out early for good behaviour is what maintains order in most prisons.

There are better ways of maintaining order than allowing criminals to walk our streets.
 
I believe that different crimes do deserve different levels of prison. Someone in prison for a more minor crime should be allowed more luxuries than someone who has murdered.

Although, brand name shampoo and playstations are out of the question.

I disagree, prison should be prison regardless. Like out of Shaw shank redemption. But they should get education and qualifications if they want it.
 
expect to be thrown in a room with no windows and white like an apple mac. till you go crazy.

they shouldnt get an education and qualification on tax payers money. even food they should be feed with food aid.
 
I don't think anyone's saying that every crime has a 100% chance of being correnctly solved. But for the ones, such as what I said earlier, where there really is no doubt about it, then the death penatly should be available.

But that doesn't work either. You can't apply the death penalty in that way.

Fear would need to be the incentive. You start a fight with the wardens, expect to be in a chair for a few months.

Yeah, probably not the best solution....
 
I disagree, prison should be prison regardless. Like out of Shaw shank redemption. But they should get education and qualifications if they want it.

I just can't see that, lets say someone gets sent to prison for manslaughter, purely accidental, and they didn't really do any wrong action, something just went wrong that led to someone dying.

I don't feel they deserve as harsh a stay in prison as someone who has brutally raped and murdered a string of people.
 
Back
Top Bottom