You know you can't do this, right?
Not completely true.
She may be using the same provider for both policies, who have mirrored her no claims on the new policy from the existing policy.
You know you can't do this, right?
![]()
Welcome to the real world...
PS: I thought insurers can only reject a claim for fronting if it is one of the named drivers which owns the car rather than the main driver. Is that not the case then?
Not completely true.
She may be using the same provider for both policies, who have mirrored her no claims on the new policy from the existing policy.
Do any do this? I was with Prudential and they certainly wouldnt let me do it when I wanted to insure a 2nd car. Had to take my 2nd policy with 0ncb
Nah - it doesn't really matter who the official owner of the vehicle is.
As we all know insurance company's hate paying out.
So if they suspect fronting - Young driver named rather than main driver then they will happily investigate.
Investigation costs are quite minimal and if it means they don't have to pay out then they are "quids in".
So basically, just about every insurer will investigate crashes where the "main driver" is 40+ and the "named driver" is less than 21 and it was the named driver that crashed?
Oh crap..
Right, may need to get that changed.
I wont be driving my own car as much as my mum will be driving a car less nice then her ownPromise.
Do any do this? I was with Prudential and they certainly wouldnt let me do it when I wanted to insure a 2nd car. Had to take my 2nd policy with 0ncb
And don't think that insurers don't cross-reference or check old records because they do.
When I was asked by Admiral if I had any points in the last 5 years, I said no. This was incorrect, I'd had 6 points 4 years and 11 months ago. They cross-referenced my new quote with my driving record from my old Bell policy. This is often done on an inter-company basis too.