Vauxhall Meriva - review

Soldato
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
5,060
Location
The remittance desk
Been to Birmingham for a few days with work and I was asked to hire a car - company policy apparently - to take me and anyone else who wanted a lift. he choice was astounding - 1.4 or 1.6. No choice of car, just the engine!

Anyway, on Monday, the guy turns up and sees the look of disappointment when he hands over the keys to a Vauxhall. I was expecting an Astra at this point and was even more upset to find an '08 plate Meriva Design sat their mocking me. It was in a reasonable colour (dark blue) but even so....damn!

First Impressions

It's hardly a looker, in fact it's fairly ugly to be honest. It looks strange with the really tall design and then the small wheels. The back windows are blacked out and a look in the boot finds that there really isn't one. Never mind, we're only going over night and there is only 3 of us. I put a ticket on it and head back to work.

Living with it

I was nervous about this, being as I drive a 728 I didn't have a good felling but around town the 87bhp 1.6 engine is enough to nip in and out of junctions and I found the brakes to be excellent for stopping it though the 'feel' and feedback are lacking. Steering is light as you would expect but the gearbox - DEAR GOD - what an abortion that is. Changing gear was like throwing levers in a Victorian signal box. A long throw and very notchy, not good enough after 100k, let alone 11k on the clock. The clutch is pretty much on or off but acceptable.

At motorway speeds it feels much better than I had expected though when I got past 80 on my private road, it didn't feel as assured and stable. Handling is as you would expect, fairly poor but it isn't designed to be exciting in the twisties. It was roomy enough inside for all 3 of us and we had space for our luggage though if it had been more than a couple of nights, we would have struggled. BIG gripe for me was the blind spots - Vauxhall made a big effort to incorporate as many of these as was physically possible and made the whole process of overtaking a big bag of fun. The front pillars are way to large and you're too close to them.

Interior & Spec

This is going to sound strange but it was almost too well spec'd. It was the neck end of 12 grand new and that is a lot for a stretch Corsa. There is just too much gear for it to be any good because once you start throwing lots of gear in, you have to sacrifice quality and this is the Meriva's worst character by miles. The 'design' model I had came with: Electric Windows, Electric Mirrors, Front Fogs, Alloys, darkened rear windows, Air Con, CD player, dual headphone sockets in the rear, lots of air bags, front arm rest, Cruise Control, 'clever' rear seats and a sun roof front and rear.

Good spec for a boggo-wifey-shopper-kart it may be but there is a massive sacrifice of quality. The plastics are terrible and poorly fitted which would really annoy me if I'd laid out £12k of my hard-earned. The seats were made from rock and pain and not only sent my arse to sleep but my man-bits too. The lads both complained about how bad the seats really were. I had to turn the radio off the sound was that poor from the speakers and I went though the radio and CD and they were equally rubbish, tinny and horrible. I don't expect a serious sound system, I just want acceptable and for the extra few pounds on slightly better speakers wasn't ever going to stop it being affordable. Which brings me to my earlier point - why oh why laden it down with lots of stuff that really isn't useful? It doesn't need one sunroof, let alone 2 and why put cruise control on something that is really only suitable for the school run? It is a waste of time - the money should have been spent on a reasonable gearbox, better plastics, better seats and a nice set of speakers.

Overall

If you find yourself about to buy a Meriva, stop. Take a trip to Staples and buy a shredder and insert all of your money and in two weeks you'll feel better. I see no reason to buy one - you have to be a total dribbler to think there is any excuse. The 87bhp 1.6 8v engine was barely acceptable 10 years ago, knocking out 36mpg on the run to Brum, a great deal of which was spent at 50mph on SPECS camera sections of motorway or at 70ish in normal traffic - that is simply pathetic. The level of tat is outstanding and it's too expensive for what you get. I know people like these mini-mpv's but they are totally pointless compared to a decent family hatch.
 
I had one of these through BMW Assist for 2 days because I was too young for a proper car. It was godawful.

You'll have annoyed the deluded Vauxhall Defence Force members now though so watch the thread turn sour when they ride on a wave of tedious crap to defend the beautiful marque.
 
I'd have refused it to be fair.

It wasn't a suitable car for the job.

No real choice, it is suitable according to my employers. The problem being, things like this are decided by people in London who either eat Muesli and ride the tube or by people who have a BMW 540 as a 'status' car.

The green focus groups will have decided a 1.6 is plenty and you are stuck. I'm ignoring the rules and taking my BMW next time, even if they refuse to pay the petrol!
 
Same :D

87bhp from a 1.6 sounds quite low. I thought most modern engines of that size should be capable of at least 100bhp? Did Vauxhall dig it out of the ground or something?

Vauxhall have always had this incredible skill of making the most crippled engines for their run of the mill cars.

Like my corsa that had 47BHP from a 1.2 :eek:
 
My Mum drives one of these, the only positive point I've found is my Grandma can get in and out easily after a double hip replacement.
 
I'd have refused it to be fair.

It wasn't a suitable car for the job.

In what way was it not suitable for the job?

It is crap car, and totally agree about the diabolical gearchange, but it's perfectly capable of transporting a few people in reasonable comfort. I had one near the end of last year to take four of us up to Birmingham and it was a "suitable" car, though certainly not a good one. You could certainly argue a Ford Ka or Fiat Panda wouldn't be suitable, but not a small MPV.
 
Sounds like you've justified my hatred of these things. My sister bought one last summer as a family car. She did get a fairly big discount but I still said it was a terrible idea, she should have got an older hatchback or even a Mondeo.

Whats worse is she got it in bright red, it looks like a blummin tomato :o
I thought she had some taste, after having an MX5 and then a CRX :rolleyes:
 
In what way was it not suitable for the job?

It is crap car, and totally agree about the diabolical gearchange, but it's perfectly capable of transporting a few people in reasonable comfort. I had one near the end of last year to take four of us up to Birmingham and it was a "suitable" car, though certainly not a good one.

It is not a motorway cruiser, it doesn't have the acceleration stats to safely join and traverse a motorway, it is even the wrong shape and size to deal with sidewinds and turbulance from passing lorries.

And as for "reasonable comfort", perhaps for people currently held up in Guantanamo Bay, it might resemble comfort, but spending any prolonged period of time in the seats of the meriva left me incredibly stiff and aching.

Yes, I have driven one, and yes it was one of the worst cars I have had the misfortune to drive.
 
It is not a motorway cruiser, it doesn't have the acceleration stats to safely join and traverse a motorway.

i'm sorry, but 90bhp is more than enough to safely join a motorway. you're saying you can't get a 90bhp car to do 50mph on a slip road, most if not all of which are downhill?

also, the op said that the car had to be 1.4 or 1.6. name a car with that displacement which fulfills your requirements that can be had from a rental company
 
i'm sorry, but 90bhp is more than enough to safely join a motorway. you're saying you can't get a 90bhp car to do 50mph on a slip road, most if not all of which are downhill?

also, the op said that the car had to be 1.4 or 1.6. name a car with that displacement which fulfills your requirements that can be had from a rental company

It's true, the 1.6 is sufficient, even if you have to rag the arse end off it, it was capable of reaching 70 off a slip road with ease.
 
It is not a motorway cruiser, it doesn't have the acceleration stats to safely join and traverse a motorway, it is even the wrong shape and size to deal with sidewinds and turbulance from passing lorries.

That is the weakest thing I have heard in a while. If you are not capable of safely merging a car that just happens to have a little under 90bhp with motorway traffic then you should hand your licence in right now. How do HGV and large van drivers manage? And people in Nissan Micras?
 
Paradigm i did 103k in 2.5 years in a 90bhp car with absolutely no issues at all, i even got quite a few points because those were the days in which i used to be the ******** in the outside lane shouting at people to get out of the way. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom