Right, I'm not sure how I'm going to get this across in a post, but I'm going to give it a go.
My fiancée had been off work for 6 weeks due to a work related sickness. This was all covered by various doctor's notes and was 100% legit.
Upon returning to work, she was informed that the company (which is a franchise) was going to be splitting her hours between two different stores (in two different cities). To cap that off it wouldn't be the same job as she was currently doing.
The kicker is this: the store they are trying to send her to isn't a franchise, it's not owned by the same company as the store she works at. Contracts at the two stores have a completely different company listed as 'The Company'. Based on that, I'm not sure how they can do it.
The HR department of the parent company don't want to know because it's a franchise, and the grievance procedure sends you to the bloke who's making the decision in the first place. With them being different companies, I can't see how they can send her there any more than someone working at OCUK could send someone to a competitor. It's a different company.
We've tried the CAB and they don't want to know because they aren't funded to help people who are in full time employment ! That's another rant for another time.
So, I don't really know what I'm expecting anyone on here to come up with, but I've gone over it so many times in my own head I figured someone on here might have an idea !
Cheers guys, much appreciated.
My fiancée had been off work for 6 weeks due to a work related sickness. This was all covered by various doctor's notes and was 100% legit.
Upon returning to work, she was informed that the company (which is a franchise) was going to be splitting her hours between two different stores (in two different cities). To cap that off it wouldn't be the same job as she was currently doing.
The kicker is this: the store they are trying to send her to isn't a franchise, it's not owned by the same company as the store she works at. Contracts at the two stores have a completely different company listed as 'The Company'. Based on that, I'm not sure how they can do it.
The HR department of the parent company don't want to know because it's a franchise, and the grievance procedure sends you to the bloke who's making the decision in the first place. With them being different companies, I can't see how they can send her there any more than someone working at OCUK could send someone to a competitor. It's a different company.
We've tried the CAB and they don't want to know because they aren't funded to help people who are in full time employment ! That's another rant for another time.
So, I don't really know what I'm expecting anyone on here to come up with, but I've gone over it so many times in my own head I figured someone on here might have an idea !
Cheers guys, much appreciated.