One expense claim too far for Jacqui Smith?

Haha. And to be fair, i dont mind my tax paying for her husband to watch porn, i mean look at her :p


I carnt belive how much they get ontop of there salary
 
I'm confused. There are three possibilities I can think of at the moment. They are:

1) Sky news is over-hyping this and she isn't "furious" at her hubby at all.
2) She's a miserable, repressed old cow who for some reason has a problem with pornography.
3) Either way, the fact remains that it isn't her husband's fault the tax payer ended up forking out for his adult activities:

A £67 bill for television services was "mistakenly" claimed by Jacqui Smith under her Commons expenses last June.
So, SHE makes a claim for her TV bill but it's HIS fault, because he ordered some pr0ns? What a frigid, miserable woman she must be. Not to mention rubbish with accounting. Loosen up, woman. You'll live longer and be happier. :D
 
Haha. And to be fair, i dont mind my tax paying for her husband to watch porn, i mean look at her :p


I carnt belive how much they get ontop of there salary

they claim there whole life as expensives there actual salary is like a huge bonus.

its a joke that they claim all this crap as expenses when common people are expected to have the essentials only.

you cant even get a crisis loan for a broken fridge , freezer , bed etc because the goverment doesnt count them as essential yet these ******* claim all sorts of stupid **** it wouldnt suprise me if some of them claim lottery ticket money back as expenses
 
Taxpayers pay for her internet connection? Do they wonder why we are in an economic crisis? She already gets paid way more than the national average yet she claims tv and internet. What else are these sodding MP's getting for free with our tax money?
 
Taxpayers pay for her internet connection? Do they wonder why we are in an economic crisis? She already gets paid way more than the national average yet she claims tv and internet. What else are these sodding MP's getting for free with our tax money?

Houses, groceries, transport... You know, the basics that the rest of us get for free, too. Oh, wait... :mad:
 
Apparently the funniest thing about this whole thing is, that the expense claim has a statement you have to sign along the lines of "this is an expense incurred in the performance of my duties" (or some such), which means that if nothing else she's effectively lied on the form, as the expense wasn't one she herself incurred, nor required due to her parliamentary duties...
 
Apparently the funniest thing about this whole thing is, that the expense claim has a statement you have to sign along the lines of "this is an expense incurred in the performance of my duties" (or some such), which means that if nothing else she's effectively lied on the form, as the expense wasn't one she herself incurred, nor required due to her parliamentary duties...



MP Lies Shock....


M
 
Back
Top Bottom