I can't believe that you fall for this rubbish.
The fact that news channels were running the same apparent footage, that was the same shot, camera angle and so on,
What would you expect then? CNN showing the towers with the Sydney Opera House in the background? Fox opting for the Taj Mahal? ABC deciding not to focus on the towers at all?
Seriously, that's not how it works. Lots of networks will probably syndicate the same footage, especially at such short notice. Even if they don't, they're likely to have their cameras in the same place, pointing in the same direction.
There's a few videos that are from different locations yet they have the same woman screaming in them, it's the same scream, and when she talks it's obviously the same person/voice.
Links? In any event, I'd suspect that lots of distressed women sound pretty similar.
Plus the fact that just the day before they had ran a mock run of what to do if a plane was hi-jacked and flown into the twin towers.
Source?
The US has strict rules about planes going off course, which involves fighter jets being distpatched to the rogue aircraft.
Fighter jets
were dispatched to intercept the planes. They just didn't get there in time. Not surprising, considering that the authorities had to locate two planes with their transponders turned off in some of the busiest airspace in the world. In any event, I can't see that shooting a plane down over Manhattan is much better than having it crash into the WTC.
Also, a lot of video footage, and photographs that were supposedly taken by witnesses are crops of a far wider shot, with just a change in tone to make the image look like it's from a different location and camera.
I'm not sure how it's supposed to look greatly different if you change angle or get a bit closer? It's a massive building that's on fire, not an intimate performance of Romeo and Juliet.
On some of the videos, you can see molten liquid pouring out the window holes as the building is collapsing as well, which would suggest the use of thermite.
As people have said, thermite isn't going to cut through a concrete beam horizontally. You don't demolish buildings with thermite. It's not explosive. Even if you did, the materials would have to be painstakingly set up without anybody noticing. This would be weeks of conspicuous work, in a highly secure building. If explosives were used, an explosion of that magnitude would have created an incredibly loud noise (140dB+). Nobody heard this noise, and it's not on any of the footage.
Without it being a conspiracy, I really can't see the American government being so bothered about human lives though. The fact that they've invaded a lot of countries many times shows they have no real appreciation for human life, so if they care so little, they can hardly be expected to care for more people, where the only difference is that they live in America.
But none of this twaddle answers a critical question. Why? Why would the US govt. kill 3,000 of its own people? If you think that would happen to justify a war on terror, you're living in cloud-cuckoo-land.
o
