NIST admits freefall speed

gillywibble said:
That's a completely different matter. The whole thread is about NIST's admission that freefall speed took place. As I said in the OP, you can draw your own conclusions as to its significance.
Click to expand...

But they haven't admitted free fall speeds. Not in the way people are claiming. the building did not fall at free fall speeds. Don't back track now.
They've admitted free fall speeds for 8 floors. They did not lie in previous reports. the building certainly did not fall at free fall speeds.
 
The claim was "NIST admits freefall speed". Where is the evidence to support this claim?

NIST did not "admit freefall speed" at any time, and certainly not in that footage.
 
Evangelion said:
The claim was "NIST admits freefall speed". Where is the evidence to support this claim?

NIST did not "admit freefall speed" at any time, and certainly not in that footage.
Click to expand...

It does, but not how the ct and half the people in here think. Only 8 out of teh 47 floors fell at free fall speed.

911c58a9b5.jpg


Yet again CTs telling half truths, misrepresenter the data and being idiots.
 
gillywibble said:
Those 8 levels are part of the building are they not? Hence for a certain time, the building fell at free fall speed. It's in the report.
Click to expand...
:rolleyes: teh building did not falla t free fall speeds. Start time to end time clearly shows that.
the buidling once it had suffecient weight above to absoultly destroy the lower floors. hits free fall for a coupel of seconds. Before slwoing again due to the strngthened lower section and a growing debris pile, and how does hat support explosives it doesn't. As I said cts are massively misrepresenting the report.

To say the building fell at free fall speeds is a total lie. It did not. That implies teh building from start to finish fell unhindered, it did not.
 
Last edited:
Fire Wizard said:
Going by what you're saying though, terrorist attacks wouldn't be an issue. But the fact that they are such a high level threat surely indicates what you're saying isn't true. This is what makes terrorists so dangerous, you never truly know what they are up to, the kind of resources they have access too and when they will strike next.
Click to expand...

But most real terrorist incidents are a much lower level of sophistication such as suicide bombings or old fashioned car bombs or gunmen attacks. It seems that the 'world' changing events, the most devastating and costly, and those that lead to war or draconian laws to control the law abiding, are so sophisticated that there is no way that anyone other than a government could have instigated it.
 
Out of interest gillywibble, what is the conclusion you're coming too if World Trade Centre Building 7 did fall at free fall speed? For instance, because it did fall at free fall speed, it was a controlled demolition.
 
Fire Wizard said:
Out of interest gillywibble, what is the conclusion you're coming too if World Trade Centre Building 7 did fall at free fall speed? For instance, because it did fall at free fall speed, it was a controlled demolition.
Click to expand...

I'm afraid I can't come to a conclusion about controlled demolition. I know practically nothing about the subject.
 
AJUK said:
It seems that the 'world' changing events, the most devastating and costly, and those that lead to war or draconian laws to control the law abiding, are so sophisticated that there is no way that anyone other than a government could have instigated it.
Click to expand...

Such as? I can't think of any terrorist attack in the last 100 years that was "so sophisticated that there is no way that anyone other than a government could have instigated it".

The 9/11 attacks were breathtakingly simple in their planning and execution. The most sophisticated aspect was the flight training!
 
Here is the letter sent to the victims family http://www.911proof.com/NIST.pdf

a lot over my head but they say NIST admits free fall...

" NIST’s own studies confirmed that virtually none of the steel in either tower reached temperatures hotter than 500 degrees.
The point at which steel weakens is 1000 degrees and melting point is reached at 1,500 degrees, according to NIST itself "

these guys change there mind more then my Mrs
 
Last edited:
AJUK said:
But most real terrorist incidents are a much lower level of sophistication such as suicide bombings or old fashioned car bombs or gunmen attacks. It seems that the 'world' changing events, the most devastating and costly, and those that lead to war or draconian laws to control the law abiding, are so sophisticated that there is no way that anyone other than a government could have instigated it.
Click to expand...

Some terrorists with box cutters hijacking a few planes isn't really all that sophisticated tbh.
 
gillywibble said:
I'm afraid I can't come to a conclusion about controlled demolition. I know practically nothing about the subject.
Click to expand...

I apologise if this post isn't clear. I couldn't think how to word it in such a way that made sense and so it got my point across.

You're saying that World Trade Center Building 7 did fall at free fall speed. How does this effect your views on the September the 11th 2001 attacks?
 
Last edited:
Inquisitor said:
Some terrorists with box cutters hijacking a few planes isn't really all that sophisticated tbh.
Click to expand...

The coordination of four large planes, flying complicated paths through the USA airspace to hit a specific target with display pilot precision all within a short time frame seems sophisticated to me.
 
I wouldn't call it precision piloting. Navigate to a general point, then the wtc stick out for miles and fly it into it. Don't have to navigate busy airspace.
 
AJUK said:
The coordination of four large planes, flying complicated paths through the USA airspace to hit a specific target with display pilot precision all within a short time frame seems sophisticated to me.
Click to expand...

The flight paths weren't complicated. The targets were huge. The pilots were trained.

What's so sophisticated about this?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom