NIST admits freefall speed

what do you think thy are, they are wirless networks. Please show one example where a complicated sequence with hundreads and probably thousands have been used like that.

With so many buildings in line of sight of the towers you could even use microwave bursts to detonate the triggers.

Movies use complicated remote controlled effects sequences all the time, often with buildings, etc. in the way, this aspect is pretty trivial I dunno why your making such a meal of it unless you really don't even want to consider the possibilities.
 
yes i just compared the secret plane to a building :O

and no, you missed my point, i am trying to say that the thousands of workers would have had no idea what was going on.
 
Movies use complicated remote controlled effects sequences all the time, often with buildings, etc. in the way, this aspect is pretty trivial I dunno why your making such a meal of it unless you really don't even want to consider the possibilities.

I'll just highlight your problem.

I have considered it, I'm making a "meal" out of it, as it does not add up.
 
Rroff, regardless of the possibilities of the World Trade Center Buildings having had explosives planted in them before hand, what are your thoughts on articles such as this one here, which I have posted above.
 
Another idea is that the US government knew the planes where to be hijacked, and installed demolitions to make sure the towers fell after the planes hit.

that way, you dont have to explain complicated remote flying aeroplanes, and you can explain the towers falling
 
you imagine it wouldn't be hard? come on pull teh other one.



so when are these planes being totally renovated, in the few hours between flights? when they are being refuelled. Or in the hectic big services which are crammed in-between flights?

You really don't even want to consider the possibilities do you...

Over the course of even 6 months in buildings like these companies come and go all the time. It wouldn't be that hard to get hold of a couple of floors and setup a dummy company there... you could even hire people to come in doing data entry, etc. who would know nothing about what your really doing, to make it look legit...

I'm pretty sure its easy enough to "renovate" your office space, I'd imagine getting access to security check schedules, etc. would be trivial so you'd look for your window of opportunity when theres a decent gap between to setup in.

The logistics of rigging up and keeping this out of sight is another matter, but very much within the realm of possible with a decent budget.
 
Another idea is that the US government knew the planes where to be hijacked, and installed demolitions to make sure the towers fell after the planes hit.

that way, you dont have to explain complicated remote flying aeroplanes, and you can explain the towers falling

Thats a bit far fetched as they'd have no idea where the planes would go in and they'd have to extensively rig many floors making it impossible to hide away.
 
well they wouldnt tho, if they knew planes where going to hit, then they could rig the towers at key points to cause a collapse, it wouldnt need to be perfect, it would jsut need to cause them to structually fail
 
You really don't even want to consider the possibilities do you...

Over the course of even 6 months in buildings like these companies come and go all the time. It wouldn't be that hard to get hold of a couple of floors and setup a dummy company there... you could even hire people to come in doing data entry, etc. who would know nothing about what your really doing, to make it look legit...

I'm pretty sure its easy enough to "renovate" your office space, I'd imagine getting access to security check schedules, etc. would be trivial so you'd look for your window of opportunity when theres a decent gap between to setup in.

The logistics of rigging up and keeping this out of sight is another matter, but very much within the realm of possible with a decent budget.

So right we have what could be called a sort of theory, with huge gaps in. Where's the evidence for these works and office refits over say 6months?
 
well they wouldnt tho, if they knew planes where going to hit, then they could rig the towers at key points to cause a collapse, it wouldnt need to be perfect, it would jsut need to cause them to structually fail

But then you wouldn't get a near vertically collapse. According to CT
 
So right we have what could be called a sort of theory, with huge gaps in. Where's the evidence for these works and office refits over say 6months?

You seem to forget I'm not trying to push A theory here... just saying that the evidence doesn't rule out the possibilities of alternative explanations for these events, one such possibility somewhat along the lines of what I've outlined... I'm not trying to push a solid theory.
 
You seem to forget I'm not trying to push A theory here... just saying that the evidence doesn't rule out the possibilities of alternative explanations for these events, one such possibility somewhat along the lines of what I've outlined... I'm not trying to push a solid theory.

Then why bother and I bet if some one checked, we wouldn't find several floors being taken over in the lead up. if so why haven't CT sites cottoned on to this.
 
Because getting hold of the building manifests and having any way of verifying the information in these manifests is probably not within the grasp of the average person on the internet...
 
The building collapsed remarkably like controled demolitions.

why does the placement of the planes hitting matter, obviously its going to be high up, because of the surrounding buildings.

the website people keep posting about disproving 9/11 has a statement from Osama about hitting the towers high up.

If you were to rig the towers to go down, if woudnt matter where the planes hit because your bringing the whole lot down anyways, as long as the towers where designed to collapse the planes could hit anywhere
 
Back
Top Bottom