NIST admits freefall speed

[Rroff]

No i'm sayign companies and public dont get to look around a military site for 30 years.


Anyway good mythbusters. 1000lbs of thermite and it didn't even cut through a car, with mavity on it's side. As you can see it turns to liquid and flows with mavity.

I don't think thermite was used, if anything was, in the WTC, but if it was it could be used in many forms for horizontal cutting including linear charges and hybrid penetrator charges.

That mythbusters video is lol tho, they just chuck ton of it down haphazardly and expect it to cut through a car, you could do it more effectively with a 100th of the amount and the right technique (look at some of the videos done by richard hammond).

 

[deuse]

I dont know, i have no answers to any of these questions your asking, and you know i dont.

your giving me a load of this because you wont accept anything other than the official reports.

im arguing with you and throwing whatever i can back because i dont believe the reports.

i have no proof of anything, and no answers to any scientific questions.

jsut what i beleive did, or did not happen.

there it is, in black and white, either accept my opinion or dont but sitting there patronising me or anyone else isnt going to further the debate.

Dude I would just let them be, most on here are ok
then you got the " im going to wind you up party"
and the rest are " its my ball and im taking it home " kinda people.

you know mommys boys who throw their toys when they lose..

 

[Sankari]

I dont know, i have no answers to any of these questions your asking, and you know i dont.

your giving me a load of this because you wont accept anything other than the official reports.

Well, no. I accept many other things which are not found in the official reports. It's just that I refuse to accept anything which isn't supported by a reasonable standard of evidence and proof.

im arguing with you and throwing whatever i can back because i dont believe the reports.

i have no proof of anything, and no answers to any scientific questions.

jsut what i beleive did, or did not happen.

there it is, in black and white, either accept my opinion or dont but sitting there patronising me or anyone else isnt going to further the debate.

What I want to know is why you hold the opinion that you do.

 

[Sankari]

I don't think thermite was used, if anything was, in the WTC, but if it was it could be used in many forms for horizontal cutting including linear charges and hybrid penetrator charges.

That mythbusters video is lol tho, they just chuck ton of it down haphazardly and expect it to cut through a car, you could do it more effectively with a 100th of the amount and the right technique (look at some of the videos done by richard hammond).

So, what you're basically saying is that it was entirely possible for fire to destroy the WTC.

 

[Glaucus]

but if it was it could be used in many forms for horizontal cutting including linear charges and hybrid penetrator charges.
.

which is back to conventional explosives and as far as I'm aware horizontal cutting has never be shown to work on anything substantial.

 

[Rroff]

which is back to conventional explosives and as far as I'm aware horizontal cutting has never be shown to work on anything substantial.

If your talking industrial spec sure...

 

[gillywibble]

fair enough, but will you admit the building did not fall at free fall. 8 stories might be part of the building, but it is not the building. 8 floors fell at free fall, not the building. It's a huge difference.

Yes, I agree.

I apologise if this post isn't clear. I couldn't think how to word it in such a way that made sense and so it got my point across.

You're saying that World Trade Center Building 7 did fall at free fall speed. How does this effect your views on the September the 11th 2001 attacks?

After further consideration and review, I think it is irrelevant. I am satisfied that the part of the building that fell at free fall speed did so due to the structural failure within, and that there is no conspiracy insofar as the failure of the building itself.

I apologise for the delay in replying but I thought it only fair to review the evidence in detail which I have spent the last few evenings doing. The collapse of building seven is scientifically explainable.

 

[RDM]

If your talking industrial spec sure...

And so for the "thermite" conspiracy to work we now have to invent a brand new type of thermite...

 

[Rroff]

nm