Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I think 2 4890's would be faster in most cases.
the 295 is 2x 275 i think but the 4890 scale better from what i've seen so come out on top especially on resolutions over 1080p.
The 295 is 2x260gtx slightly overclocked iirc.
Jdidnt get along with the 295 tbh i think they have driver issues
Have you tried connecting to hdmi via dvi out ? its the only digital input i have on my monitor and using this gives colour corruption and wont auto scale , " not a problem on my ATI 3870X2 "also the same when i connected to my Sony TV using the same kind of connection , i had the card RMA replaced and still the same!! Also tried different Mobo, ram ,Processor ect and every Nvidia driver on the planetNo they haven't.
No such problems here with my 260GTX SLI which is for all intents and purposes fairly similiar to a 295.
If it wasn't for the price I'd say 295 all the way (massive overclocking headroom), but the price just nulls any performance advantages.