E-Gov Petition Not To Reduce NSL to 50

They forget to mention it will prolong rush hour congestion... noobs.

Don't worry. The Tories will sort things out this time next year
icon14.gif
 
Some have been on the news lately for various things, so not that ignored.

There's a difference between a two minute soundbite on a news programme, and a statement that makes a Govt. sit up and take notice.
I'll leave it upto you to decide which pigeon hole e-petitions fall into.
 
Well it was slightly tongue in cheek but... please continue.

The sad thing is that while you may well have been joking, thousands upon thousands of people actually believe what you said will happen.
As Woody Allen once said about politics, "It doesn't matter who's up there, they're ALL terrible".
 
“There will be some in the driving lobby who think this is a further attack and a restriction on people’s freedom,” [Jim Fitzpatrick, the roads minister] said. “But when you compare that to the fact we are killing 3,000 people a year on our roads, it would be irresponsible not to do something about it. I’m sure that the vast majority of motorists would support the proposals.”

New research by the Department for Transport has found that reducing the speed limit could save 200-250 lives a year.
...
The new 50mph limit is intended to reduce the high death toll on rural roads, where, in 2007, 69% of car crash fatalities took place. It will apply to single carriage A, B and C roads. Local authorities will have the power to raise the limit to 60mph on the safest roads, but will have to justify it.

Ministers plan to use average speed cameras, which monitor speeds over distances of up to six miles, to help enforce the new limit. The cameras have already been installed at 43 locations. The Home Office is expected to approve their wider use later this year. Speed Check Services, the company behind the cameras, claims the number of deaths or serious injuries at its sites has fallen on average by 60%.

Fitzpatrick said: “If you look at the figures on rural roads, there are disproportionately more people dying there than on any other roads. The nature of some rural roads, with dips and bends and difficult conditions, means that the 60mph limit is not enough.”
It doesn't affect motorways, dual carriageways or the safest A roads and seems to me to be a perfectly reasonable, targeted proposal significantly to reduce injuries and fatalities.

As someone has said, the Tories will doubtless repeal it when they next get elected :rolleyes:
 
I hope the tories get in and cut this nannying crap. They tend to actually spend money on roads more than labour anyway? As in making more / better roads, rather than letting the pot holes and congestion stay.
 
Back
Top Bottom