Should Daily mail links be banned?

[geekyEd]

Seriously they come up with some utter tripe.
eg. Impending doom

At least once a day im reading some rubbish conspiracy theory on here based upon what some muppet had taken for fact from this newspaper.

Its really annoying sifting through this rubbish when worth while thread's like the random picture thread get pushed onto page two!

/rant

 

[meghatronic]

Click or do not click. The choice is yours.

 

[Greenlizard0]

Most certainly. They're as rubbish as tabloid links, yet for some reason people seem to read them with the same seriousness as broadsheets.

Click or do not click. The choice is yours.

Without a thread title etc., how would we know a Daily Mail link's inside?

 

[Azagoth]

Seriously they come up with some utter tripe.
eg. Impending doom

At least once a day im reading some rubbish conspiracy theory on here based upon what some muppet had taken for fact from this newspaper.

Its really annoying sifting through this rubbish when worth while thread's like the random picture thread get pushed onto page two!

/rant

Simple solution, just don't click on the threads or any of the links in said threads.

Why would you want to have your form of censorship forced onto people who may be interested in reading something, even if it is way out there and bloody stupid?

 

[magick]

Seriously they come up with some utter tripe.
eg. Impending doom

2012 is getting a lot more coverage than just the daily mail.

 

[magick]

And agreed with megahtronic and azagoth, no ones forcing you to click on them.

 

[vincent1989]

i think they should come with a health warning, but that it's up to you to decide whether it's worth the click or not.

 

[Azagoth]

2012 is getting a lot more coverage than just the daily mail.

Maybe, but those publications will still be going in 2013. What will they be saying then?

 

[magick]

Maybe, but those publications will still be going in 2013. What will they be saying then?

There will be very big changes I think. And like i've said if nothing big happens by the end of 2012 i'll come in here and make a very, very humble apology to everyone.

 

[geekyEd]

dont double post in my thread...... really.

and yes magik you are possibly the worst offender... "in the world"

more to the point what am i doing up at this hour... need sleeeeep.

 

[MikeHunt79]

Meltdown! A solar superstorm could send us back into the dark ages - and one is due in just THREE years

I think they should be allowed if only for comedy value...

 

[mattheman]

Well what you may think rubbish others may like and what you like others may think rubbish. If you dont like it you dont have to read it, pretty simple i think.

For every 20 conspiracy theories 1 is always true, should be ban World Snooker Championships because i think its rubbish? or Maxim UK Magazine ?

 

[geekyEd]

yes definatly.

 

[CliffyBiro]

There will be very big changes I think. And like i've said if nothing big happens by the end of 2012 i'll come in here and make a very, very humble apology to everyone.

Can't wait.

 

[Rainmaker]

Define 'big'?

 

[Slinky1989]

I thought that 2012 thread was going to be about the olympics

 

[Ben M]

you should be banned.

 

[Spektor]

Can we ban the readers to?

 

[Jambo]

Never mind the links. I think the Daily Mail should be banned.

 

[SexyGreyFox]

Most certainly. They're as rubbish as tabloid links, yet for some reason people seem to read them with the same seriousness as broadsheets.

And then you've got the real pillocks who dismiss everything.
I read stories from all over the internet, cross reference with other news sources and then post the best one which could be the Daily Mail.
eg MAN SURVIVES CRASH WITH TREE BRANCH THROUGH HIS BODY and some idiot will post 'Lol, Daily Mail'.