Associate
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2005
- Posts
- 402
- Location
- Worcestershire
I got Sky+ HD insalled a fw weeks ago (new install, ordered Wednesday evening online, installed the following Monday, install even beat the posty with my viewing card LOL, so he showed me how to do that in the secret menu).
May I ask what exactly is the problem with Amstrad boxes that you all seem to want to avoid them? They are the latest models right? And most people on Digital spy seem to think they are the best so far. Minus the contrast issue, but mne seems fine. Haven't checked the setting, but it's not banding or anything, or too bright or too dark in places at all. No oversaturation either. Silent as a whistle (only time I hear it is when putting it into stand by and you hear the HDD wind down). No failed recordings, no skipping in recordings, nothing. So why the need to avoid these boxes? Is it the HDD replacing thing? Are these picky? Hopefully not, as I might upgrade mine, don't need to yet, as I am only on basic package, but still.
I have to say it is a marked improvement over other channels. I personally do like the look of the new EPG cannot wait to get it for my box, think it looks nice and sleek, and has some great features (highlighting HD programs being one of them). Disappointed with some channels choice for programs in HD. Like Jag HD, whoops I mean FX HD, although I complained a week ago or thereabouts about that and suddenly NCIS has appeared on the EPG for Friday, and Dexter in HD too. Sweet.
Does the box output SD better in 1080i mode? Will have to try that, as mine is set to Auto, and some SD channels just look terrible. Luckily C4HD/Sky1HDs approach (simulcast, with upscaled SD content) means I can watch those channels instead of the low quality versions.
My installed bloke wasn't a regular Sky Guy (i.e. in the Sky branded van) so he put our dish on the chimney stack, and told us we need to tell sky when we need them out, as it needs to be a specialist installer. He rang for confirmation before he did it, but couldn't get it, but ended up just putting it up there anyway. LOL.
May I ask what exactly is the problem with Amstrad boxes that you all seem to want to avoid them? They are the latest models right? And most people on Digital spy seem to think they are the best so far. Minus the contrast issue, but mne seems fine. Haven't checked the setting, but it's not banding or anything, or too bright or too dark in places at all. No oversaturation either. Silent as a whistle (only time I hear it is when putting it into stand by and you hear the HDD wind down). No failed recordings, no skipping in recordings, nothing. So why the need to avoid these boxes? Is it the HDD replacing thing? Are these picky? Hopefully not, as I might upgrade mine, don't need to yet, as I am only on basic package, but still.
I have to say it is a marked improvement over other channels. I personally do like the look of the new EPG cannot wait to get it for my box, think it looks nice and sleek, and has some great features (highlighting HD programs being one of them). Disappointed with some channels choice for programs in HD. Like Jag HD, whoops I mean FX HD, although I complained a week ago or thereabouts about that and suddenly NCIS has appeared on the EPG for Friday, and Dexter in HD too. Sweet.
Does the box output SD better in 1080i mode? Will have to try that, as mine is set to Auto, and some SD channels just look terrible. Luckily C4HD/Sky1HDs approach (simulcast, with upscaled SD content) means I can watch those channels instead of the low quality versions.
My installed bloke wasn't a regular Sky Guy (i.e. in the Sky branded van) so he put our dish on the chimney stack, and told us we need to tell sky when we need them out, as it needs to be a specialist installer. He rang for confirmation before he did it, but couldn't get it, but ended up just putting it up there anyway. LOL.



