sickening police violence

Once again, I find myself agreeing with Von, this thread has covered pretty much every nuance and bias from both sides now, so, lets leave it and see what the courts decide, if and when these cases ever get that far; otherwise it'll end up as a slagging match ........ oh, hang on. ;)
 
soapboxstuart said:
So we have established that on at least two occasions you have been shown to be less than correct.
Why would we now regard any of your subsequent pontifications as containing any relevant substance?

How sweet :)
Click to expand...


I think you made your point & to continue your Attack on Dimple just shows you to be as ignorant as he was earlier in the thread. At least Dimple has the kahoonas to admit when he is wrong & adjust his thinking according to the NEW evidence.

Personally I think you are a Returnee here just to cause trouble, Either that or your attitude just Stinks.

I suggest you take a Chill pill.
 
malc30 said:
I think you made your point & to continue your Attack on Dimple just shows you to be as ignorant as he was earlier in the thread. At least Dimple has the kahoonas to admit when he is wrong & adjust his thinking according to the NEW evidence.

Personally I think you are a Returnee here just to cause trouble, Either that or your attitude just Stinks.

I suggest you take a Chill pill.
Click to expand...

Im not attacking DM at all. He stated in large font that he had used the word maybe. I pointed out that in a previous post he had not used maybe.
So far AcidHell has told me to 'engage my brian before posting' and called me 'daft'
Dm has said 'you still don't get it - how sweet' and suggested that I am on drugs 'what are you on'
YOU then suggest that MY attitude stinks - interesting?
 
It just doesn't look good mate you keep going on about it, You were right & Dimple accepts that, To keep going on about it is poor form, That's all. :)
 
AcidHell2 said:
Perhaps as new evidence comes available therorys and ideas change. Where as you are set in stone and as such it's pointless listening to you. I didn't realise someone could be so daft.
Click to expand...

Dm stated that Tomlinson was drunk.(post #822)
What did he base that on - evidence? What evidence? There never was any evidence that Tomlinson was drunk.
Therefore there has not been new evidence, theories haven't changed - it was a sweeping generalisation used to justify a violent act.
Much like your statement that a court case would 'cost millions', although to be fair, presumably when new evidence became available to you you did change this to the more accurate figure of 'loads'
I would not say I am set in stone I merely don't jump to conclusions based on nothing.
Finally, it is unfortunate that you are ignorant enough, or feel that your argument is failing that you have to resort to petty name calling.
I would always try to not stoop to this level, although in your case there is no need to point out your frailties - your posts manage that more than adequately.
 
malc30 said:
It just doesn't look good mate you keep going on about it, You were right & Dimple accepts that, To keep going on about it is poor form, That's all. :)
Click to expand...

I can assure you that I am a new poster.
I was unaware that as such I was unable to argue my case as vociferously as more experienced posters. If this is the case then I apologise.
I do however feel that I have certainly not laboured any points more or less than anyone else on here and would suggest that you look at some of the responses I have received and then make a judgement.
Once again though if this doesn't look good to you then I apologise.
 
I feel perhaps folks are railing on Soapbox a bit too hard as well, however can we all get on now?, I`m sure as this pans out there will be ponts to discuss.
 
newbiejim said:
ermm it was my clearly clumsy attempt @ humour?
Click to expand...


Then I apologise. But I agree with Von S: this thread has long since had anything useful to say. Just for once it would be good for people to say: "I know, let's wait until all the facts are known and then make up our minds!" We can all dream I guess.


M
 
scorza said:
It's already happened - Tamil Tiger protests smashed their way through police lines yesterday and are continuing to block traffic in Parliament square.
Click to expand...

Considering that there were 3,500 of them, it's hardly surprising that they managed to push through police lines - particularly since the cops in question are not riot police (as the G20 cops were). No shields, no helmets, no armour, no asps, and no anti-riot tactics (because there was no riot). Bit of a difference there. And where's your proof that this is the result of police being scared about heavy-handed methods? You don't have any. It's just something you've made up.

The Tamils have been protesting since the 6th of April; in other words, concurrently with the G20 Summit and G20 protests. The police response to the Tamils has remained consistent throughout; there has been no change in their methods, and there has been no violence or rioting.

They're simply Tamil protests, by the way; not "Tamil Tiger protests".
 
newbiejim said:
It gets worse
Click to expand...


A police officer is being investigated after allegedly writing on a website that he was keen to "bash some long haired hippys" at the G20 protest.

Pc Rob Ward apparently put the note on Facebook on the evening of 1 April, the first day of City of London protests.

A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said: "The matter has been recorded and will be investigated appropriately."
​

Well, that certainly gives us a few clues about the motivation of our noble constabulary.
 
Evangelion said:

A police officer is being investigated after allegedly writing on a website that he was keen to "bash some long haired hippys" at the G20 protest.

Pc Rob Ward apparently put the note on Facebook on the evening of 1 April, the first day of City of London protests.

A Scotland Yard spokeswoman said: "The matter has been recorded and will be investigated appropriately."
​
Click to expand...


Oh dear.
You know in a strange sort of way I'm starting to feel sorry for the posters who have backed the police actions on this thread.
EVERY day they have had to deal with something new that diminishes the strength of their argument.
I look forward to the inevitably robust arguments in favour of this latest disaster.
Clearly there are Police officers that went to the G20 with an agenda.
It is highly unfortunate that a man has died as a result.​
 
Last edited:
Can we talk about the plane on the conveyor belt now? or TV license rules for students?I'm bored with this 'til we get more official inquiry results.
 
soapboxstuart said:
Oh dear.
You know in a strange sort of way I'm starting to feel sorry for the posters who have backed the police actions on this thread.
EVERY day they have had to deal with something new that diminishes the strength of their argument.
I look forward to the inevitably robust arguments in favour of this latest disaster.
Clearly there are Police officers that went to the G20 with an agenda.
It is highly unfortunate that a man has died as a result.
Click to expand...

4 rogue coppers out 1000s & 1000s.
Yeah, OK - I do feel foolish backing the coppers.

(4 was a number I pulled out the air, no proof, no sauce, no backup, so don't ask)
 
Last edited:
dmpoole said:
4 rogue coppers out 1000s & 1000s.
Yeah, OK - I do feel foolish backing the coppers.

(4 was a number I pulled out the air, no proof, no sauce, no backup, so don't ask)
Click to expand...

Are you this sarcastic in real life? I hope not.

And its the officer in the vid you are backing, not 1000s &1000s.

There is a difference.
 
Last edited:
i-bert said:
Are you this sarcastic i real life? I hope not.
Click to expand...

Actually I'm 100% worse but I have to back off on here.
In real life people can see my facial expressions though.
You ought to see me on stage in front of a pub full of people but I normally get a chant of 'You fat *******' back.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom