• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Show us your 4890 1Gb FutureMark Scores!

Speed

Speed

Speed

Soldato
Joined
23 Nov 2002
Posts
9,848
Location
Near Bristol
Hi Guys,

I've recently purchased a 4890 1Gb and seem to be having some problems getting good scores on Vantage, not to mention some driver issues.

So what are you getting? Orb links or score breakdowns would be great with CPU and card clock info.

Thanks,

Mark
 
how about this...

20kfirst.jpg


or

3dmarkvpfirstattempt.jpg


going to go higher as im under water to see what i can get.
 
Speed said:
Hi Guys,

I've recently purchased a 4890 1Gb and seem to be having some problems getting good scores on Vantage, not to mention some driver issues.

So what are you getting? Orb links or score breakdowns would be great with CPU and card clock info.

Thanks,

Mark
Click to expand...

does it run your game's ok ?
 
for some reason i have been unable to upload to futuremark....keeps saying theres a config (so i bought em :() was getting about 17K at stock on 06

i havent tryed ATI tool, tbh i have downloaded just about every voltage tweak program i could find after ASUS smart dr refused to work onve the stock cooler was taken off, ATI tool was on my list but i found a program that worked with Rivatuner so i didnt bother, will post links if you want to use it :)
 
Sayso said:
for some reason i have been unable to upload to futuremark....keeps saying theres a config (so i bought em :() was getting about 17K at stock on 06

i havent tryed ATI tool, tbh i have downloaded just about every voltage tweak program i could find after ASUS smart dr refused to work onve the stock cooler was taken off, ATI tool was on my list but i found a program that worked with Rivatuner so i didnt bother, will post links if you want to use it :)
Click to expand...

So you don't know what your score was @ stock in Vantage? It would be a great help to me if you could run it at stock. Just so we can compair scores.

Yeah I was just wondering, as I had lots of artifacts come up with the ATI Tool scanner, had to ease back on the overclocks to get it artifact free and stable.

Btw what 4890 1Gb did you purchase?

schizo220168 said:
then what are you worried about a higher score in 3d mark ?
Click to expand...

I'm just a little concerned that I'm not getting the same performance as other people with 4890s. All the reviews I've seen with Vantage are 10k+ but I've yet to crack 10k, even with an overclock. So just wondering if I have a faulty card.
 
Last edited:
i have the ASUS at 1.38 volts under water my highest O/C without the overvolt was 940/1080.
will run vantag for you at stock tomorrow going to get my daily spy fix :)
 
Last edited:
Firstly apologies as my memory is going, my 4870 scored 10245 not 11000+ as stated but that is still more than the OP gets.

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dmv=311671

Secondly, The ReadlDeal, isn't the OP and the other posters on here comparing graphics score and not overall score so physx and cpu doesn't come into it?

The OP can't crack 10k even overclocked so something slightly adrift.


The GTX285 you linked to in that review scores 11891 so he is way behind that.
 
Think we got our wires crossed i thought you were refering to the guy that posted screen shots of his overclocked 4890 getting over 12k when you said thats a poor score. I only mentioned the nv cards were using physx incase some people were looking at overall scores.

If i am not mistaken in another thread i think the op mentioned his cpu was a q6600 running at stock 2.4ghz. If so that would be where the problem lies.
 
TheRealDeal said:
Think we got our wires crossed i thought you were refering to the guy that posted screen shots of his overclocked 4890 getting over 12k when you said thats a poor score. I only mentioned the nv cards were using physx incase some people were looking at overall scores.

If i am not mistaken in another thread i think the op mentioned his cpu was a q6600 running at stock 2.4ghz. If so that would be where the problem lies.
Click to expand...

That's correct yes, I was hoping to find someone else with a Q6600 @ stock and a 4890 to confirm that is the problem.
 
If I remember correctly my 4890 gets around 10500 stock and an extra thousand on top when overclocked. This is running on an Q6600 at 3.2Ghz with 4 gigs of RAM

edit, I can set the cpu to stock speed and run the test when I get home tonight and report the results if you would like
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom