Couldn't we have had Cudicini a while back? Would have been a better choice than a joker who gets beaten from 41 yards?![]()
I don't see the value in this:
1) He's not English, how sure can we be of his commitment? What happens when England play Spain?
2) Potentially disruptive influence on the squad, how would you feel if you were an English keeper and you had some foreign schmuck who can barely speak the lingo keeping you out of the side?
3) It's not worth taking the chance on someone who is just a 'decent' keeper. If it was Casillas, maybe I'd feel differently, but lets face it, proper English keepers like Shilton and Seaman were better than him. If Foster or Kirkland (the only two I rate) can't pick up the mantle then we'll just have to wait until a decent one comes to the fore.
Top contribution. Cudicini has been and still is on par with the best in the world. He was never behind Cech ability wise Chelsea just had the "misfortune" of having the best two keepers in the world and sadly one had to be left out. And, in my opinion Cudicini is English as he has lived and worked here for over 10 years.
Top contribution. Cudicini has been and still is on par with the best in the world. He was never behind Cech ability wise Chelsea just had the "misfortune" of having the best two keepers in the world and sadly one had to be left out. And, in my opinion Cudicini is English as he has lived and worked here for over 10 years.
Couldn't we have had Cudicini a while back? Would have been a better choice than a joker who gets beaten from 41 yards?![]()
If we want to go down that road then lets see about our manager who can barely string a sentence together, in English.
sadly its never gonna happen, but he is better than James thats for sure!