Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
I'm not sure, but then I don't support removing the safety nets, but reforming them so they treat everyone equally, which is a different idea entirely.
The point is, though, that many people won't accept freely given charity, but will accept state handouts, which are nothing but enforced charity at the end of the day. I've seen this first hand when I've offered to help people, they respond that they are not a charity case then get on the phone to the local council demanding money or goods... It makes no sense to me.
The question about taxes and their relationship to charity was just curiousity, no agenda behind it except to find out if you knew of a proven link since I know you support lower taxation in general.
It is slightly odd that people choose to differentiate yet at the same time understandable as it is much easier to disassociate from a faceless entity (in this case the state) than it is the individual(s) who give charity directly and therefore potentially less embarrassing. People might well also feel an obligation to an individual who gives charity but the state is less likely to engender such feelings.