We've had this discussion before.
If Top Gear mag call it a hot hatch, then I call it a hot hatch.
[TW]Fox;14220445 said:99.9% of diesel cars are turbodiesels so I really do not see how this is relevant?
And that is the whole point I am making.
All diesel engines in pretty much every application they are used HAVE to have a turbo bolted to them to be usefull.
Therefore they are modified engines they are not standard un fetered engines.
The vast majority of petrol engines in use in whatever form of transport, do not HAVE to have extra gadgets bolted to them to make them fit for purpose, that is all I am saying.
You cannot in any way compare the power from a standard unfeterd petrol engine to a modified diesel, you have to compare like for like.
Show me one non turbo diesel that will outperform a similar capcity non turbo petrol engine?
I think thats a bit petty, take the spark plugs of of a petrol engine while you're at it to make it fair.
How do turbo diesels compare to the modern small capacity turbo petrols like the Abarth 500 do you think? The turbos add a nice bit of torque, still have the higher rev advantages I'm assuming and have decent fuel economy too.
No that is not fair then.
A petrol engine NEEDS spark plugs to run, it does not NEED a turbo to run and do it's intended job.
A diesel engine should not NEED a turbo if it has been developed and built to do it's job properly.
If it does NEED a turbo to be anything other than useless, then, in my view, it is a flawed design.
this is something that ive never really understood about BMWs
they've nearly always (up until recently) always been very anti FI. Arguing its an easy route to performance , for use by lazy engineers who cant be bothered to develop their engines properly, and crucially, doesnt deliver as good or linear driving experience as N/A does
A diesel engine should not NEED a turbo if it has been developed and built to do it's job properly.
If it does NEED a turbo to be anything other than useless, then, in my view, it is a flawed design.
instead.No that is not fair then.
A petrol engine NEEDS spark plugs to run, it does not NEED a turbo to run and do it's intended job.
A diesel engine should not NEED a turbo if it has been developed and built to do it's job properly.
If it does NEED a turbo to be anything other than useless, then, in my view, it is a flawed design.
I'm struggling to see the point of this debate.
Mr LoL: I think Honda also have the same stance about forced injection, don't they?
I don't see exactly why but I guess you have to stick by your beliefs!
yeah thats why they champion their VTEC system in all their high performance cars.
Vtec isn't exclusive to their high performance models.
rather than going the arguably better turbo or supercharged routes
Vtec isn't exclusive to their high performance models.

You could say the same of a petrol with twin cams, electronic ignition or fuel injection. The engine doesnt need them in its basic design but nearly everyone uses all of those now. I dont see you problem with a turbo on a derv its just the way develpoment has taken it.