The all encompassing BNP thread - keep all crap in here.

How does he impress you ?

As for being the BNPs greatest asset, they are not renowned for having a pool of formidable political talent.

Stick Nick Griffin on Question Time with razor sharp politicians such as William Hague and he would be taken to pieces.

He would love to go on there but they refuse to invite him.
 
Outrageous and fascist then.

So a police officer who serves a multi-cultural society of varying religions and ethnic backgrounds should be able to take an active part in an extreme right wing party that only wants white Britons as members and advocates the repatriation of non-whites and all with the blessing of the Chief Constable ?

I think the suggestion that they should be is outrageous.
 
So a police officer who serves a multi-cultural society of varying religions and ethnic backgrounds should be able to take an active part in an extreme right wing party that only wants white Britons as members and advocates the repatriation of non-whites and all with the blessing of the Chief Constable ?

I think the suggestion that they should be is outrageous.

I think coppers should be judged on how they DO their job, not how they THINK - one's thoughts and private actions should be one's own property and domain IMO :)
 
Nick Griffin is probably the most impressive leader of any party in this country, he runs rings round the other lot and is the BNP's greatest asset.

You're living in more of a fantasy world than magick... hes a hateful buffoon of pond scum calibre. Haven't you got some stormfront thread about killing blacks you could be masturbating over?
 
So impressive indeed that in the '05 general election he polled a massive 9.2% of votes in his constituency :p

Yes 8,000 votes. Out of 75,000.

It's not unreasonable to suggest 10% of the population are 'that stupid'.

No, true, but as unfortunate as it may be that's still a reasonable number. All I'm trying to say is we still should not underestimate their support despite their limited gains. The main parties really need to address people's concerns and then the bnp wouldnt have a leg to stand on.

This seat n hertfordshire demonstrates the problem though:

Candidate
Votes %
[*Chg%] Maj
Electorate:8838 Poll:30.3% Spoilt:26

Connolly, Mary Bridget
Liberal Democrat 446 16.6
[-8.8]

Gates, Deirdre Anne
British National Party 783 29.2
[N/A] MAJ 27

Gould, Yessica
The Conservative Party Candidate 671 25.0
[+3.4]

Spellen, Nena
The Labour Party Candidate 756 28.2
[-18.4]

Working class voters won't vote CON, LIB DEM dont address their concerns and LAB are, clearly, useless, leaving the BNP as the only alternative :(

Yes, only just under 800 people are 'that stupid' but its been enough to make a difference in 3 seats.
 
So a police officer who serves a multi-cultural society of varying religions and ethnic backgrounds should be able to take an active part in an extreme right wing party that only wants white Britons as members and advocates the repatriation of non-whites and all with the blessing of the Chief Constable ?

I think the suggestion that they should be is outrageous.

How about a Muslim Police Officer that believes in Sharia Law outside of his workplace? That is outrageous. Of course not every muslim in a terrorist or believes his wife should never speak to a man other than himself on her family members for fear of being "dealt with" under "sharia law" Likewise not every BNP member is a racist. Hard to comprehend? Or does it only work one way.
 
I think coppers should be judged on how they DO their job, not how they THINK - one's thoughts and private actions should be one's own property and domain IMO :)
I'm continually amazed how you reconcile your lofty principles of individual libertarianism with your views on immigration, race and religion.

For example, surely then a person should be judged purely on their actions, rather than their race, the colour of their skin, or the religion they follow....
 
For example, surely then a person should be judged purely on their actions, rather than their race, the colour of their skin, or the religion [OR A LEGAL POLITICAL PARTY] they follow....

Then why fire a copper who has an unblemished career just because he voted BNP?
 
I'm continually amazed how you reconcile your lofty principles of individual libertarianism with your views on immigration, race and religion.

For example, surely then a person should be judged purely on their actions, rather than their race, the colour of their skin, or the religion they follow....

Heh, popcorn time now methinks :p
 
True, if you're a complete hypocrite that is.

Shame is, they aren't hypocrites, they hide behind a very false libertarian front to try and hide a hateful right wing core... only the r-tards that vote for them out of some stupid sense of "not being racist but..." buy that.
 
Is this one of those really long running joke threads? surely the joke was over after the first 50 post, we are at 276 now people.
 
Cops cannot take an active part in politics be it on or off duty and that is for any political party.

Given the extreme right views of the BNP, they were specifically highlighted as being especially forbidden and to the point that you willl face disciplinary action if found to be involved in BNP activity.

The views of the BNP are not compatible with the values of the modern police service.

:rolleyes:

yet this is allowed

http://www.nationalbpa.com/

i find that racist and offensive
 
Back
Top Bottom