Unemployment among ethnic minority communities is twice the rate of white workers, the TUC has said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4655193.stm
Can you link to an article that isn't four years old?
Unemployment among ethnic minority communities is twice the rate of white workers, the TUC has said.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/4655193.stm
In this context, and as I am sure most of you are well aware, this means any job provided in Britain. Isn't there a term for unnecessarily provoking people?what is a british job
Wow, 16% of Barnsley voters went for BNPI'm from barnsley, This is just bullcrap, Sorry but it takes takes a subpar intellect to go voting for BNP. 16% of Barnsley voters are now thick in my eyes.
Can you link to an article that isn't four years old?
British people to me means People that are here legally.
Not people that come here to get free hospital treatment free housing
and monies.
People that will stay here and build a better UK. Not take take then send the money back to there home land.
I am fed up with all the governments spending or giving money out to immigrants
In mho any immigrant that wants to come here should pay there own way
for 10 years before getting a penny.
I fail to see what difference that will make in the current climate it will just show that all numbers of unemployment have risen.
That's fine and I'm noting you've not distinguished on colour either but it differs from the BNP so when you're voting for the BNP you should think very carefully about it if their views on this don't match yours.
Why specifically pick on immigrants? Why not anyone who is taking out of the system without any obvious intention to put back into it at any time?
Or not. We don't know.
A fair point but I think we have a clear indication that unemployment is on the rise do we not?
Yes, but whether it's correlative in ethnic minorities is a different matter.
In what way does that differ from the BNP?
I was supprised to see Mr Griffin on BBC breakfast news this morning...
Mr Bill: So if an asian constitunecy member comes to you ask for help, will you give them your full attention?
Mr Grif: If they are Brittish yes, if they are a not in this country legally or if they are not contibutuing to the state, then no.
Mr Bill was trying his best to get a reaction out of him, but he didnt rise to it. He just had a moan about how the media is making false claims about racisim.
He did come out of it fairly good, but I know he really wanted to shout STAB! lol
Could you humour me and define what you mean by British people? The reason I ask is that there appear to be a few different definitions floating about and the BNP's one would seem to exclude anyone who is not what is sometimes referred to as white British.
I think it correlates to the British majority.
The BNP doesn't believe in British Asians for one, it won't allow membership to anyone who is not part of the "indigenous Anglo-Saxon, Celtic and Norse folk communities of Britain" (and such others as it feels are closely associated, Constitution 9th Edition) so it differs on a pretty fundamental level.
So what is an indigenous Briton? Well, the Equality and Diversity mob can help out here. Beneath is a section from a typical Equality and Diversity monitoring form. These are the "degrees of Britishness" which have already been created.
...snipped for space...
If a person can tick the boxes marked "British" or "Irish" they would certainly be in the indigenous ethnic group. If they ticked "Any other White Background (please specify)" and came from a former colony like for example Canada, Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, they would also be indigenous. If people are not in the indigenous group but are here legally and law abiding, then that is fine. You would have full rights exactly as now. However, there would be no PC promotion, no diversity quotas, no ethnic quangos and, unlike now, the law would be made to apply equally across all ethnic groups.
I think Griffin was talking to David Dimbleby and telling him some Sikh members on Bradford had voted for them as they would tackle the growing problem of extremists Muslims in this country and Dimbleby asked him why he was happy to take their vote but wouldn't allow them to be a member.
It's not a 'mistake' - no matter how much Asians consider themselves to be British, they never will be according to the BNP.I don't believe your initial posting was about party membership though was it? I think it is a mistake by the BNP to have that bar on membership as I bet the majority of asians in this country consider themselves to be British.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...P-leaflet-says-black-Asian-Britons-exist.htmlNick Griffin said:Commenting on the leaflet's content, Mr Griffin told The Report on Radio 4 that although 'in civic terms they are British, British also has a meaning as an ethnic description'.
'These people are 'black residents' of the UK etc, and are no more British than an Englishman living in Hong Kong is Chinese,' he said.
'Collectively, foreign residents of other races should be referred to as 'racial foreigners', a non-pejorative term... The key in such matters is above all to maintain necessary distinctions while avoiding provocation and insult.'
The manual describes the BNP's 'ultimate aim' as the 'lawful, humane and voluntary repatriation of the resident foreigners of the UK'.
'We don't subscribe to the politically correct fiction that just because they happen to be born in Britain, a Pakistani is a Briton. They're not. They remain of Pakistani stock,' he added.
The answer to this is obvious - he has no choice but to take their vote.
He does however have the ability to determine who can or cannot be a member of his party.
Just goes to show how mercenary and opportunist the british public is though - a Sikh voting for the BNP because they think they will kick out Muslims... ironic.