Associate
- Joined
- 15 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 1,230
- Location
- UK
What I don't understand is why Episode 1 was wasted on largely pointless back story which could have been sumed up in flashbacks?
E.g. Episode one- essentially Episode 2 without the love story being so...awful, and secondly, the start of Anakin slowly turning towards the dark side?
Episode two- set around a key part/event of the middle of the Clone Wars? Again, evidence of Anaking becoming increasingly aggressive and violent, etc.
Episode three- largely the same, as this one was dark enough to be okay. The main difference is that again, Anakin doesn't turn to the dark side within all of 5 minutes of hanging around Palpatine...
If they took that sort of approach, I think the trilogy would have been a lot closer to the original one.
your missing the point on why Anakin turned and your version of the story would have been a totally different outcome.
*****SPOILER****
he wasnt angry and didnt kill people for no reason before he turned, he was just naive and arrogant.
he turned to the darkside because he thought he could save Padme as he was brainwashed that the emperor was the only person who could cure her.. in 10 seconds or so he had the decision to save hes wife, or Windu... and chose the wrong one.
In Return Of The Jedi he killed the emperor because he saw another loved one about to die in the same situation, makes perfect sense to me.
The only thing i thought was retarded in Episode one was when the Jedi Council all said that Anakin Skywalker would balance the force, and then the next sentence it was stated that the Jedis thought that the Sith have been destroyed hundred of years ago.............. that doesnt take a genius to work out!
******SPOLLIER END****