OK a bit of back story,
I help a friend who runs a private IT consultant company that specialise in large scale network installs i.e. school style network's.
Well he got awarded the local schools system refurbishment, which contained full new cabling and pc plus pc in each lecture room ready for ready for future power interactive boards.
Well reading the specification we were told that was required for the pc in the research rooms, and IT lecture rooms. We recommended a small form factor or even a Intel atom based pc, with a dual core , 2 gb of ram, 120gb hard drive (students work is stored on a separate server). Running either a opensuse or Ubuntu to keep the price down and also the lower strain on a system compared to vista.
So we submit this idea to the “IT” leader at this school and she comes out with the same generic crap, so she's comes back with a specification she's decided on with her own “background “knowledge” and research....
She wants each pc to be quad core, 4 gb of ram (so the school will have to invest in 64bit operating pcs) 3800 series graphics cards and 1 tb hard drive for a system which has limited use and access to the hard drive (all students work is save on the file server not on the pc's hard drive). And require each a full system of anti virus. I can understand this specification for the teachers pc that will be running the interactive screens.
So now the systems are nearly 3 times the cost and all they are going to be doing is run a web browser, office application's and printing of a students work. Not exactly a need for a quad core 4gb system.
I'm starting to understand why the schools around here are constantly struggling with staying within their budgets.
Sorry for the rant, but probably due to this women so called intelligent idea, the school will have to cut back in a certain area.
I help a friend who runs a private IT consultant company that specialise in large scale network installs i.e. school style network's.
Well he got awarded the local schools system refurbishment, which contained full new cabling and pc plus pc in each lecture room ready for ready for future power interactive boards.
Well reading the specification we were told that was required for the pc in the research rooms, and IT lecture rooms. We recommended a small form factor or even a Intel atom based pc, with a dual core , 2 gb of ram, 120gb hard drive (students work is stored on a separate server). Running either a opensuse or Ubuntu to keep the price down and also the lower strain on a system compared to vista.
So we submit this idea to the “IT” leader at this school and she comes out with the same generic crap, so she's comes back with a specification she's decided on with her own “background “knowledge” and research....
She wants each pc to be quad core, 4 gb of ram (so the school will have to invest in 64bit operating pcs) 3800 series graphics cards and 1 tb hard drive for a system which has limited use and access to the hard drive (all students work is save on the file server not on the pc's hard drive). And require each a full system of anti virus. I can understand this specification for the teachers pc that will be running the interactive screens.
So now the systems are nearly 3 times the cost and all they are going to be doing is run a web browser, office application's and printing of a students work. Not exactly a need for a quad core 4gb system.
I'm starting to understand why the schools around here are constantly struggling with staying within their budgets.
Sorry for the rant, but probably due to this women so called intelligent idea, the school will have to cut back in a certain area.
Last edited: