University of Colorado team finds definitive evidence for ancient lake on Mars

Permabanned
Joined
15 Sep 2006
Posts
4,642
Location
Somewhere in York
A University of Colorado at Boulder research team has discovered the first definitive evidence of shorelines on Mars, an indication of a deep, ancient lake there and a finding with implications for the discovery of past life on the Red Planet.

Estimated to be more than 3 billion years old, the lake appears to have covered as much as 80 square miles and was up to 1,500 feet deep -- roughly the equivalent of Lake Champlain bordering the United States and Canada, said CU-Boulder Research Associate Gaetano Di Achille, who led the study. The shoreline evidence, found along a broad delta, included a series of alternating ridges and troughs thought to be surviving remnants of beach deposits.

"This is the first unambiguous evidence of shorelines on the surface of Mars," said Di Achille. "The identification of the shorelines and accompanying geological evidence allows us to calculate the size and volume of the lake, which appears to have formed about 3.4 billion years ago."

A paper on the subject by Di Achille, CU-Boulder Assistant Professor Brian Hynek and CU-Boulder Research Associate Mindi Searls, all of the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, has been published online in Geophysical Research Letters, a publication of the American Geophysical Union.

Images used for the study were taken by a high-powered camera known as the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment, or HiRISE. Riding on NASA's Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter, HiRISE can resolve features on the surface down to one meter in size from its orbit 200 miles above Mars.
Recreation of what it might have looked like.

14725_web.jpg


Source

Interesting stuff! If there was once water, where is it now? If its still there does that mean there is even more support for bacteria life? Does it also mean a manned mission to Mars is even more possible now?
 

I know it's an artists impression, but things like like just give ammunition to the 'red' vs 'blue' sky debate. They need to dial down the red a bit there.

nteresting stuff! If there was once water, where is it now? If its still there does that mean there is even more support for bacteria life? Does it also mean a manned mission to Mars is even more possible now?

Some of it is still there as permafrost, as the Phoenix lander discovered. I don't know (and probably neither do the scientists) how much of it has been accounted for, and if there is any more, where it all went.
 
so wait, they found ridges, made a picture, put water in it and said, these ridges maybe have been made by a lake........... definitive?

infact, wouldn't you actually need movement from a lake to carve out something like that, which would mean at one end you would likely have a mountainous area and the other end, eventually a sea it would have run into. At some stage the water had to collect for some reason and run out to a certain area.

As for their idea its a shoreline, so there's a sea, thats narrow and some magical tidal force caused it to leave a beach like formation?


Any ideas on original pictures they came to these conclusions from?
 
Back
Top Bottom