Xonar D2/D2x vs Essence STX

Associate
Joined
22 Aug 2008
Posts
64
Location
Newcastle - Under - Lyme
Hi, I hope somebody on my forum can help me with this.

I need a good sound card and I use headphones. I initially wanted the essence stx due to its inbuilt headphone amp. Yet now I am not so sure, as the essence doesn't have multi channel anolgue out, only right and left, meaning that If I want 2.1+ I need a separate decoder, and run it via optical.

So now I am stuck, STX due to amp and better sound quality or D2/X for multi channel analgoue outs and cheaper price (on offer for around £76 ends today)
 
A little off-topic,
I've been looking at the Essence for a while, still trying to compare it to the Creative Titanium. Made a couple of posts and done the research but nothing shows whats better, will be used for gaming mostly ( i heard asus sound cards suck for gaming, so could some1 tell me if this is true? and which one is better?)
 
I have been researching this card as well.

Everything I have read indicates that it is good for gaming, and that the hoopla about eax is not really that relevant in reality, as the sound is actually good.

Do a serach on google for xonar essence review and most have gaming tests. Seems to do well in all of them.

Of course this is subjective, as I haven't yet got one of these cards, but the reviews are fairly consistent on the matter.

I am getting a new card because the xX-Fi Gamer card I bought had buggy drivers on windows 7. Their support is also non-existent so far. Personally I won't be buying a Creative card again in a hurry.
 
Gaming support on Xonar cards isn't quite as complete as on X-Fi but it's by no means bad. It's second best in the industry. There are certainly benefits with Xonar, it's Dolby Heaphone function giving a more realistic in-game experience than the X-Fi's CMSS-3d IMO.

You may find EAX doesn't function as is should in some older games on Xonar.

I generally advise people to stick with X-Fi if they're using speakers. If you're more of a headphone user Xonar is the way to go.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, yea its still pretty confusing... i was against buying a sound card, now i want one but i want a really good one... ;)

Depends on what you want a soundcard for. For example Creative cards are good and provide a good upgrade for every purpose over an on-board solution. Generally prefered mainly by gamers but does good in music and movies aswell.

The Xonar series from Asus provides somewhat better quality than the Creative cards in music and movies but they are not as good in games. While providing support via emulation is considered inferior but not by a great margin. The Xonar Essence is mainly targeted towards headphone users.

Any decent, dedicated sound card will provide an upgrade to your sound over your onboard solution.
 
Well to be accurate, the gaming (EAX) benefits of a Creative Card are useless on vista and windows 7.

They decided to remove the HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) from Vista and Win 7. This was used by drivers, in this case the sound card drivers to communicated with the windows kernel and vice versa. Due to buggy drivers this caused blue screens. Therefore Microsoft removed the HAL to stop this. Hardware accellerated EAX needs the HAL to work and therefore is useless on vista or later.

Asus get around this by using emulation to emulate EAX 5.0.
Creative now do a more limited version of this by using a new opensource standard called OpenAL. They convert EAX commands to openAL commands using the a program named alchemy, yet this does not work with all games, and therefore is more limited than Asus' method.

When it comes to curcuitry and build quality, I belive Asus to be better than Creative, and have heard many comments suggesting the same. I would disagree with the comment that Asus is better for headphones, this only applies to the essence due to it's headphone amplifier. The other cards like the D2/D2x are just as good at reproducing sound on a decent pair of speakers, as they are headphone, although they do have some good headphone features such as Dolby Headphone.

So If you are gaming using vista, don't get a creative card. There's no point.
 
Well to be accurate, the gaming (EAX) benefits of a Creative Card are useless on vista and windows 7.

They decided to remove the HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) from Vista and Win 7. This was used by drivers, in this case the sound card drivers to communicated with the windows kernel and vice versa. Due to buggy drivers this caused blue screens. Therefore Microsoft removed the HAL to stop this. Hardware accellerated EAX needs the HAL to work and therefore is useless on vista or later.

Asus get around this by using emulation to emulate EAX 5.0.
Creative now do a more limited version of this by using a new opensource standard called OpenAL. They convert EAX commands to openAL commands using the a program named alchemy, yet this does not work with all games, and therefore is more limited than Asus' method.

When it comes to curcuitry and build quality, I belive Asus to be better than Creative, and have heard many comments suggesting the same. I would disagree with the comment that Asus is better for headphones, this only applies to the essence due to it's headphone amplifier. The other cards like the D2/D2x are just as good at reproducing sound on a decent pair of speakers, as they are headphone, although they do have some good headphone features such as Dolby Headphone.

So If you are gaming using vista, don't get a creative card. There's no point.

Brilliant post. Probably the most helpful I've seen on this forum! :D

I've been looking for information like this for a while, you've really helped me decide for my next build, thanks!
 
Brilliant post. Probably the most helpful I've seen on this forum! :D

I've been looking for information like this for a while, you've really helped me decide for my next build, thanks!

Unfortunately not. It's wildly inaccurate (Edit: to clarify - about game compatibility - some of the other info was OK). EAX 3, 4 and 5 work better on X-Fi Cards on Vista and Window 7 than any other soundcard. They use their Alchemy software to translate DirectSound3d / HAL calls to OpenAL.

Asus do not currently offer as good EAX compatibility as Creative.

As I've said previously, X-Fis are the more fully featured cards for gaming. I chose Xonar because I prefer Dolby Headphone but you do lose out on some effects in a number of games.

Edit: Having tried both - Alchemy is much more user-friendly than DS3D-GX. Less to remember. DS3D-GX is great when it works, but it doesn't work often enough. Many games are now OpenAL native too so neither system is required.
 
Last edited:
:(


Argh! Just when I thought I'd sussed it. I'm majorly confused now..

All the reviews I've read still rate the Xonar EASILY as the better card though even for gaming. I use a headset for gaming anyway which is what it excels in.
 
Well I'd recommend Xonar, as I rate Dolby Headphone much higher than CMSS-3D headphone. They are good cards but just not quite perfect.

For gaming compatibility, I'd put them about on par with Audigy (which do up to EAX 4 natively). Xonar has EAX 3, 4 and 5 in a number of games but it's by no means universal and it's not always perfect emulation.

Sound quality is right up there with the best X-Fis available though. Maybe better.
 
But if you're using headphones for gaming, isn't the Xonar the best choice? Regardless of EAX, as the Dolby capabilities (so I've heard) more than make up for it..?
 
The main difference between Dolby Headphone and CMSS-3d heaphone is that the former sounds like you're listening on speakers. The sound is thoroughly outside your head. It's very easy to forget your'e wearing headphones. You can tell what's in front or behind you as well as left and right. The immersion factor is great.

With CMSS-3D on X-Fi you get a sightly better sense of sound direction but you're not going to forget that you're listening on headphones. I found the directional aspect almost un-naturally accurate. That could be a good thing though. It's less immersive but perhaps better for competitive gaming. X-Fi does a few things better though, like giving an impression of whether something is above or below you. It's rare that I've had that impression on Xonar.

I think my ideal money-no-object solution would be an X-Fi with Digital Out to a very expensive receiver that had Dolby Headphone built in. Finances don't allow that, so I'm sticking to Xonar for the time being.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, but thats the problem with alchemy, you have to convert the commands to OpenAL ones, this program that does this only supports a few games, whereas through the software emulation on Asus cards, you don't neccesarilyget perfect emulation of effects, but at least it works with every game on vista and win7, whereas you have to have a program supported by the alchemy convertor to be able to convert the eax commands to openal commands. This also requires time, whereas with the asus cards, they are emulating on the fly, so to speak.

For more info on this check here:
http://www.techspot.com/drivers/driver/file/information/8660/

Sorry I did remember reading an article on showing the list of games the Alchemy conversion software supported, yet it was a while ago and I can't remember where it was.

Nevermind, I have found a list of verified and unverfied games, that can have EAX (DirectSound3d) commands converted to OpenAL commands.
http://connect.creativelabs.com/alchemy/Lists/Games/AllItems.aspx
http://www.soundblaster.com/alchemy/

Check these two sites.
Again I would still recommend Asus for best compatibility under Vista and Win7 and any future windows after that unless Microsoft decide to bring back the HAL. I would also reccomend them for the ease of use, you don't have to manually convert commands, it does it's best to emulate upto eax5 although it takes cpu time, and I would reccomend them for better audio circuity.

Anyway, my best piece of advice is believe who you want, corroborate my advice with others and most importantly, buy the soundcard you think best for you, testimonies can only go so far.

Oh and by the way Uriel, if you had read my previous post before slating it's credibility, you may have noticed that I did refer to the conversion of EAX commands to OpenAL.
 
Last edited:
Sorry - I didn't mean to come across as aggressive. I did read your post thoroughly though ;). Unfortunately I still have to keep my initial stance that it's unreliable information. I won't let that go unchallenged because people make expensive purchasing decisions based on forum advice. Apologies if some of this is strongly worded. Nothing to do with you, just years of frustration trying to find an adequate (and as yet non-existant) soundcard.

I've recently tried to stick to one rule when giving advice on hardware forums: if I've not tried it, keep quiet (or state explicitly that I'm passing on 2nd hand information). To give a bit of background info: I've used 3 different X-Fis (Xtreme Music, Go! and Prelude) and a Xonar D2 in my current machine (Edit: Nearly forgot a Club3D C-Media card and onboard Realtek - I guess that means I've tried something from most of the major PC audio providers). Stuck with the D2 as it was my favourite (the Prelude was supposed to be its replacement), but it ain't perfect. It's a compromise and I'm losing some features I'd rather have by not using an X-Fi. I have corresponded with Asus Support and they have confirmed that DS3D-GX does not get EAX working in a considerable number of games. Been through all sorts of loops sending them screenshots and stuff. Some issues have been fixed in their (all to infrequent) driver updates and patches but by no means all.

Your post above only provided links to information on Alchemy. Alchemy isn't really the problem here. I'd add that I have never failed to get a game working perfectly with Alchemy. I'm sure there are exceptions but they're rare. It can be a pain to get working but if you know what you're doing you can set it once and forget it. DS3D-GX on Xonar has to be set individually for each game. If you do not remember the correct setting for DS3D-GX either the game sounds frequently don't work or at worst games simply fail to run or crash. It's a manual change each time you change games. Huge difference in user friendliness.

Fact is, in spite of what Asus have claimed in their publicity material, DS3D-GX does not work for EAX in a significant number of games. A quick read of Asus's support forums will quickly tell you a number of people that can't get EAX 3, 4 or 5 working in specific games. I can tell you for a fact that EAX 3 and 4 do not work in Rome: Total War or Thief: Deadly Shadows as I have tried them myself. Recent drivers have been an improvement. Multichannel surround usually works although it had problems with quite a few games in the previous set of drivers. Getting EAX (up to 5) working is now an advertised feature though. It would be different if Asus were still marketing Xonars as EAX2 cards but they claim up to EAX5 on their website. If you don't tell people otherwise they are entitled to expect it to be working.

On conversion - Alchemy is converting into OpenAL. However DS3D-GX is also converting into XEar3D. In practice it doesn't matter. Both are so close to instantaneous and with so little CPU load that you won't notice. There's practically no delay and no framerate drops. Very few games are still published now using DirectSound3D/HAL. Games are, however, still published with EAX. DS3D-GX has frequently failed to work with newer games, requiring patches down the line to work. Assassin's Creed and Bioshock come to mind. Mass Effect still sounds dreadful on Xonar without using software audio rendering.

Regarding the games list you posted. Creative have published the list and you can find it with a quick google. I've posted that list a number of times on this forum, sometimes giving advice on how to get games running with Xonar. Every game on that list that states Alchemy is needed also requires DS3D-GX to be switched on for Xonar. I think most of them work. However, many OpenAL games with EAX3, 4 and 5 (some of which aren't on the list) also need DS3D-GX. A significant proportion of these just do not work properly.

Let me know if you can find an Asus published EAX compatibility list for Xonar because I've never turned one up. Come across a lot of people on their forums complaining about crashes, missing sound effects, missing surround channels, missing music, crashes etc.

Edit: Deinos93. The bit of your post I was saying was wildly inaccurate was that Asus's emulation worked better than Alchemy. Most of the rest was fine. Sorry if it came across as tarring with the same brush.

Even the stuff on gaming compatibility you got wrong was just repeating stuff I've seen on reputable hardware websites. A lot of places predicted that X-Fi would no longer have an advantage in Vista because of the loss of the HAL. As it turned out, Creative came up with a solution that nobody has bettered. Part of this, I'm sure, is that Creative pay games companies to include EAX in order to sell their proprietary technology. Asus' solution is reverse engineered and it wouldn't surprise me if Creative are deliberately making it difficult for Asus to keep up with compatibility in newer games. It's an interesting situation. Kind of reminds me of the virus vs antivirus war.

Further edit: A few links to threads where people are reporting gaming issues: http://forums.overclockers.com.au/showthread.php?t=775229
http://vip.asus.com/forum/view.aspx...X&id=20080817073444078&page=1&SLanguage=en-us
 
Last edited:
Np, Uriel, thanks for the apology. I'm glad you questioned me though, I do admit I don't have personal experience with these cards, I was only relaying information that I have read. Your point about saying when I relay information is valid as, yes to the majority of people including me £70+ is a great deal of money, spending it on a sound card.

Also you are right to question my information. Its always best to look at information with objective eyes.

Yes Asus will have a hard time keeping up with Creative, its just in my opinion the idea of having to convert each game, in my opinion seems harder than the asus form of emulation, yet again I have no personal experience with these processes.

It would help if all game makers could adopt the new opensource format of OpenAL. This would make sound card makers, jobs easier and level out the playing field in my opinion. Yet undoubtably I believe you are right about Creative paying games companies to promote and include EAX in games, which if openAL with to be used, they would not be able to do this as the format is not a Creative exclusive.

Nyway, thanks again for your apology and you were definitely right to question me.
I appreciate your detailed response, outlining where you think I went wrong. I tried my best to relay the information I knew to help people with buying choices. I'll heed your advice next time about releasing information and make it clear when I am relaying information rather than talking from personal experience.

Now seen as you are detailed in your knowledge in sound cards. I would like to return to the original question when I started this thread.

Which would you believe to be better, D2X/D2 or Essence STX... I'm not sure about the ST as I don't know when it will be out.

Edit: I must admit though, I don't believe the alchemy software to be a proper solution as it is hardly as simple as when the effects just worked in XP. Yet, what can Creative do, Microsoft hardly gave them warning.
 
Last edited:
Well, as stated the D2 is the only Xonar I've tried. By reputation the Essence does put out a better stereo analogue signal. Of course there's the built-in headphone amp to consider.

Over at Head-Fi there's a bg thread on the STX. Generally people are impressed. I would stress that quite a few of them don't consider the STX's headphone amp to be adequate at driving demanding headphones so lots of people there are still using a separate amp with the STX. They're still generally happy with it but as a source rather than an amp.

The D2 / D2X do have an advantage over the STX when it comes to multichannel surround sound though. If you want to use 5.1 / 7.1 speakers on the STX you'd have to use the digital connection. The D2 / D2X will let you connect up by digital or analogue.

I heard something about the ST possibly rectifying this but don't know much about the card TBH. Might be worth looking into.

Another quick note on Alchemy: When alchemy works well it's very easy to use. It's usually the case that you install it, open it up, click 'detect games', select the games you want to use Alchemy for and then it works perfectly and permanently. If you install a new game, you just repeat the process. There are exceptions. Games on steam aren't autodetected and you have to add them manually (input game directory or registry) but Alchemy 'remembers' this and you don't have to do it again. Creative adding games to Alchemy isn't generally programming an individual wrapper for the new games though. It's just getting the games to be autodetected and including recommended settings (e.g. whether elevation filter should be on or off). Before Creative release updates to Alchemy a user can do this themselves. It might need a bit of experimentation but is pretty simple really.

Aside from the problems with compatibility I mentioned, the Xonar experience will not be as user friendly unless Asus come up with something that 'remembers' profiles for individual games. Having to turn DS3D-GX on or off all the time is an utter pain. Additionally, while DirectSound3D dies out and OpenAL becomes more usual (which is happening), Alchemy is no longer required. DS3D-GX is still required wherever EAX3-5 is used (which can be on OpenAL). That's one other thing that bugs me about Xonar. DS3D-GX sometimes 'breaks' EAX2 - which is just a nightmare: you can't get EAX in some games at all without reverting to some old driver before they started messing with higher-level EAX emulation.

Of course, the ideal solution would be for Microsoft to come up with their own fix to the HAL problem that would work for all soundcards. I think if they were going to do that they would have done so by now.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, for the insight into the actual workings of the alchemy program in detail.

So overall, excluding the headphone amp (originally I was going to build a cmoy, or buy one), the STX stereo headphone quality isn't that much greater than that of the D2/X. I don't think (if I bought a surround sound system) that I would be able to afford one with receiver, therefore allowing the use of optical. So the analogue multi channel is preferred as I will not be running HD formats, and could use cheaper speakers such as the Aego M's or T's which I just saw on the new products line on OC. This just give a larger flexibility than the STX.

EDIT: Oh, I would need a 5.1 AV Receiver to power the Aego T's, so that's out of the question. I can't go spending £500 on a surround sound system.

Which make do you think is better for sound quality, asus or creative. EDIT: When I say creative, I mean an X-Fi based card. I would probably go with the X-Fi Forte if I did. Both this and the essence are Amped. It's between the D2/x and a cmoy amp, the Essence STX (Not the best for games) or the Forte, great for music, perfect for games. At the moment I tend to play games and not listen to much music, yet programs like Spotify, may get me into things like blues yet :).

Oh, I don't think Microsoft will re-introduce HAL, in their opinion it would be taking a back step in system stability.

Do you think Asus cards will support OpenAl if it took hold?

Thanks for your help Uriel
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom