What has six months got to do with it? My point is that I do not want to upgrade too often. I have other thngs to spend money on, rather than buying the latest hardware. It is also a good point as there is more to life than buying the latest GPU.
PC hardware is made redundant all too quickly. I do not care so much for massive resolutions, the PC plays on 1650 x 1050 and the 360 on a 32" Samsung. They both look pretty good. It is all that matters to me and the average person.
People have other hobbies other than just lusting over the latest teraflop card. Consoles cater for them very well.
Six months is the standard argument made.
Your Xbox 360 is only pushing 921600 pixels while your 8800 which is more powerful is pushing 1732500 pixels which is just short of double & may have AA & more AF & running with better effects.
Run your 8800 at the same res as the 360 & NO AA for a fare comparison.
Redundant in terms of when its no longer of use to the user or because it fails & not because better hardware has come out.
The avg person does not worry about upgrading the PC at all.
The avg persons PC that comes to me for service is anywhere from 3-9 years old.
You have things back to front.
Only enthusiast worry about the things you claim & they only make up 1% of PC users & even only % of them have a upgrade before they need to bug.
Any hobby can be expensive & is down to the person as to how often they buy at the cutting edge & does not have to because new stuff comes out.
Its the individuals problem if they feel what they have is no good any more every time something new comes out.
Your happy with medium res & lower frame rates, i have no problem with that, but im allot more fussy, the PC gives me the choice of having things how i want & not how things are given.
The only problem i have is people claiming that there is little difference between consoles & PCs and that we should all just use consoles for gaming.
Quality comes at a price & if you want it you pay for it or you go without.