I can't think of anything I spend on that is "nice" for nice's sake.
That's a very admirable standpoint but can you really hand on heart say that at every decision point you would buy the most cost effective thing for everything in your life? Perhaps not to the point of spending 1000 times the price on a pen when a bic will do as in my case, but I think it is human nature that there will always be something that you'd rather spend a little bit extra on because it is "nicer".
Clothes are a good example. From a functional view point, clothes are there to keep you warm and protect your modesty because walking around naked is not acceptable in society. Not much else. There are a number of cost effective ways to obtain clothes that will fulfil their purpose in life. In ascending order they might be:
- Rumage around the council dump and find something for free
- Go to a charity shop and pay peanuts for something
- Get something nicer from Primark for a few quid
- Go to somewhere like M&S and blow a few more quid on something nicer
- Go to Selfridges and get something with a designer label that's really nice for a few hundred quid
- Get something bespoke made up form Savile Row or Jermyn Street for a couple of grand
- Spend something like £10K on something couture from a designer
So where might one fit on that scale? Is getting something at M&S instead of from the rubbish tip acceptable? Most would probably think so, but in this case the only reason to get something in M&S is because it is "nicer".
This isn't meant to be a dig at you, honestly, but I just wanted to highlight that we all make choices in what we spend our money on and I don't believe any single one of us on these forums has never bought something more expensive because it is "nicer".
