Car related legal question

Soldato
Joined
2 Dec 2002
Posts
6,579
Location
N.Ireland
Hi, not sure if this is the best place, but it is car related, If not suitable, could a MOD please move, thank you.

At work, our car park is under size compared to the number of people that want to use it. To try and reduce the numbers, the company had introduced a scheme...

Basics:
When you start work you can apply for a pass that you then stick to the windscreen, to show you are allowed to use the car park, however, there is no limit to the number of passes given out and thus it is first come first served (or parked in this case).

Due to a recent rise in new employees (thanks Swine Flu), more and more people have been parking in the area, but not always in actual spaces, sometimes parking behind other properly parked cars...

As of today, they sent a warning to ALL users, that if a pass is not displayed on the windscreen, then an A4 sticker is placed on the passenger Side window, and details logged, repeat offenders will get disciplinary action taken...

My car has a heated windscreen and as a result, the pass no longer sticks, so I left mine in clear view on the dash... however, as it was Not on the windscreen, you guessed it, they have stickered my car.
I have spoken to facilities and the site manager and they have removed my name form the offenders list, but will not remove the sticker as it was "put on in good faith"??? :mad:

So my question is this:
As Im at work, I do not have the means to remove this darn thing, its a full on A4 sticker and needs soap and water to remove!
Is there any law that I would be breaking by driving the car with the sticker obscuring my vision from the passenger window?

This may seam like a daft question, but there are many people here asking the same, some stating that it is a visual imparment and dangerous ???

Sorry for the long rant... :D
 
Last edited:
Ah sorry. I somehow thought it was stuck on the passenger side of the windscreen.

They do the same at the local tech and I've seen many drive off with it still in place.
 
I only ask for the sake of several people talking about it, would be interested to know as the company does not offer any means of removal on site, forcing drivers to go home with these things blocking the side view.
 
I guess the car park is open to the public otherwise there'd be no point at all to the pass system. What does the company do to those who have no pass, or is stickering their car supposed to be sufficient punishment?
And the official position is probably: you can wind your window down, can't you?
(Maybe Rain-X or something would make removal easier in future 'just in case')
 
I'd drive with the window down and then make up my own "good faith" stickers to stick on the cars owned by facilities.
 
In the eyes of the law you might have some "issues" seeing as window tints have a minimum visible light level for the B pillars forward I would assume 0% through an A4 sized patch in the windscreen would be questionable :D
 
I'd do them for criminal damage or interference with property tbh.

I lodged a civil claim with my employer for damage to my old Scorpio when they stuck a parking contravention notice on the side window. The claim was £90 for a replacement side window. They settled before it reached court for £40 for professional cleaning of the window.

If you feel confident, leave your car where it is claiming it's now unsafe to drive and demand they remove the offending item. If they don't, call the Police stating they have illegally immobilsed your vehicle and are refusing to removed the item causing it to be immobilised.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the eyes of the law you might have some "issues" seeing as window tints have a minimum visible light level for the B pillars forward I would assume 0% through an A4 sized patch in the windscreen would be questionable :D

It's the Passanger Side Window ;)
But it's because of this rule that I question the legallity of this...
 
There was a test case many years ago when a court ruled that putting very sticky warnings on a car was Criminal Damage, which is why the fashion for this died out. I would guess that it might well depend on how sticky the sticker was.


M
 
Well I left work and its been raining for a few hours, used an ice scrapper to remove the sticker, which has left some sticky residue on the glass...

At home now and I have just spoken to a police officer at a local station, he was of the opinion that the company had no right to 'stick' anything to a car, but that it was upto the driver to make sure they have full visability from all windows Before entering onto public roads and that in 'theory' the police could take action against anyone driving with such a visual impairment on the car.
He suggested I speak to the Traffic Branch for more clarity, but they were not answering the phone so I was passed to another local station, the officer there thought that the company was not doing anything wrong by placing a sticker on the car as it would not be considered criminal damage, he also said that they could take action against a driver on public roads with such a a sticker blocking the view, but that it would be a harsh officer that would do so. He also said it was the drivers responsibility to remove the sticker before entering onto public roads.

???
So two officers agree it 'could' get you in trouble legally if caught on a public road.
But they disagree as to the legality of the company putting the stickers on in the first place???

Edit: Found here
Ref: Criminal Damage Act 1971.
The damage does not have to be permanent, it could for example be caused by graffiti with a washable paint. But when deciding on the sentence for an offence, the court will take into account the value of the damaged property and the trouble and expense of restoring the property or removing the graffiti.

The Criminal Damage Act 1971 creates two levels of offence, a summary offence and a more serious offence that can be tried either in the magistrates' court or in the Crown Court.

This seams to support what the first officer told me ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom