i7, high frequency or low timmings?

Associate
Joined
27 Nov 2008
Posts
62
I only bought 3Gb of ram to start with and now want to upgrade to 6Gb.

I was initially looking at these

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MY-162-OC&groupid=701&catid=8&subcat=1389

but for £3 more should I just get the

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=MY-159-OC&groupid=701&catid=8&subcat=1392

I know the difference between 1600 and 2000 MHz will be unoticible for me as I only game, but for £3 more should I?
Or should I get the reaper with tighter timings?
 
If it was me i would pay the £3 extra. But it isnt as easy as that because that ram has been on preorder for weeks as i was going to order it for my i7 build, ended up going for the patriot viper.
 
personally I would go with the lower timings, because I believe 9-9-9-30 at 2000mhz works out about the same as 1600 at 7-7-7-24 in most tasks

If the memory module is rated 2000MHz 9-9-9-30, shouldn't it be able to run at 1600MHz 7-7-7-24? Therefore the Blade series just offers me more room to play around with?

I think it will end up being what ever is in stock or expected to be in stock.
 
Ideally you want a balance between the two, although from what I've read the triple channel gives i7 more than enough memory bandwidth so low latency is probably better.

To run DDR at 2000MHz you'll need an i7 that can run Uncore stably at 4000MHz, i7 only officially supports DDR1333(2666MHz Uncore) so that's quite a considerable overclock.
 
If the memory module is rated 2000MHz 9-9-9-30, shouldn't it be able to run at 1600MHz 7-7-7-24? Therefore the Blade series just offers me more room to play around with?

I think it will end up being what ever is in stock or expected to be in stock.

I would have thought this would be the case, has been with other sticks of ram I've had over the years.. I would rather go for the faster memory, then run it slower with tighter timings if you want.
 
Back
Top Bottom