Permabanned
- Joined
- 16 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,124
just thought i'd continue this debate since an over zealous mod is having a tiny power trip.
this is a 9/11 thread, and i thought if you managed to log onto your computer you could read the words yourself.
last time i checked i didnt realise the moderators on here had a clue as to what constituted rubbish.
i read the whole link.... i never once said this actually happened, you guys are just asserting this.
so we dont have freedom of speech on here? can you point me towards the document which shows us how purveyors of ocUK forums should act in future? or are the guidelines to shut up, pay taxes and believe whatever the BBC says?
I reposted it because you didn't have the spine to actually talk to me about this, and as people have already commented on, it is of a topic of interest. i have also reposted it again because i just wanted LOL at your assertion theres standards on here in regards to content on here... ok sure, thats why you allow such topics as 'Katie Price Vs. Peter Andre Whos Side Are You On'
but i'll take your word, yes you seem to work to some standards, granted those standards are worse than Rupert Murdoch's Sun's newspaper.... or maybe you just need some more training in your role as commissionaire general of what makes websites interesting.
ROFL.
this is a 9/11 thread, and i thought if you managed to log onto your computer you could read the words yourself.
last time i checked i didnt realise the moderators on here had a clue as to what constituted rubbish.
i read the whole link.... i never once said this actually happened, you guys are just asserting this.
so we dont have freedom of speech on here? can you point me towards the document which shows us how purveyors of ocUK forums should act in future? or are the guidelines to shut up, pay taxes and believe whatever the BBC says?
Burnsey2023 said:
I reposted it because you didn't have the spine to actually talk to me about this, and as people have already commented on, it is of a topic of interest. i have also reposted it again because i just wanted LOL at your assertion theres standards on here in regards to content on here... ok sure, thats why you allow such topics as 'Katie Price Vs. Peter Andre Whos Side Are You On'
but i'll take your word, yes you seem to work to some standards, granted those standards are worse than Rupert Murdoch's Sun's newspaper.... or maybe you just need some more training in your role as commissionaire general of what makes websites interesting.
ROFL.
Last edited:
![[TW]Fox](/data/man-of-honor/2009.png){kind=avatar}
