FUGLY Lily Cole

Status
Not open for further replies.
She's pyschologically beautiful.. and she has an amazing perfect body - google image her, some nudey stuff in there though :p really shows how anatomically perfect she is.
 
arknor said:
homos because some of us are happily married to women we have great sex with so we have higher standards than you guys who never get laid and dream about any old gilf :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

So what if you're married? You can still find another woman attractive... you're a lucky man if your wife is of that calibre - good for you :)
 
No, completely objectively here, she is damn ugly. But then 99% of super models are horrid boney cretins. Urrrg.
 
She's a head turner which is exactly what is required - I'm not saying I'd choose her over Salma Hayek for example, but she is in proportion and has curves (despite people calling her anorexic :/) but also has an intriguing face and bone structure. She has the quality of a model.

I'd choose a lot of other people over her - however, if I were single and she and I got chatting and things were leading somewhere I would be more than keen.
 
Have a look in the post your GF thread, there are plenty of better looking girls than her, but also PLENTY of worse looking girls...
 
Shes vile and looks like an anorexic china doll.
Shes like some artistic version of symmetry that doesn't look natural ie: sticks out in a crowd, sells clothes, sells top shelf mags
 
She's interesting to look at. She's different. In my opinion it's the idiosyncrasies that make a person especially attractive. Keeley Hazell, Kelly Brook, Lucy Pinder... they all look the same to me. Curvy, brunette, big breasts. That's fine, i'm not saying they're unnatractive... quite the opposite, they're very attractive indeed but there's nothing interesting about them. Nothing makes them stand out from each other.

Lily Cole, however, is attractive because not only is she pretty, but she's different, and interesting to look at. Perhaps there are a host of imperfections, but that's all good. I'd have to feed her up a bit though.

And no, I'm not an especially attractive guy and i wouldn't turn Keeley Hazell down if she asked nicely.
 
DampCat said:
She's interesting to look at. She's different. In my opinion it's the idiosyncrasies that make a person especially attractive. Keeley Hazell, Kelly Brook, Lucy Pinder... they all look the same to me. Curvy, brunette, big breasts. That's fine, i'm not saying they're unnatractive... quite the opposite, they're very attractive indeed but there's nothing interesting about them. Nothing makes them stand out from each other.

Lily Cole, however, is attractive because not only is she pretty, but she's different, and interesting to look at. Perhaps there are a host of imperfections, but that's all good. I'd have to feed her up a bit though.

And no, I'm not an especially attractive guy and i wouldn't turn Keeley Hazell down if she asked nicely.
Click to expand...

Exactly - she's got an exotic look and is a good shape for hanging clothes off...
 
Last edited:
Im still amazed that people keep going on about how thin she is..she really isn't that thin, especially considering that shes over 5'10, she's also got a pretty big rack for a supermodel. Chubby chasers, all of you :p
 
Oh she isn't anorexic in the majority of the pics on google, indeed. Couple of suspect ones but for the most part, slim will suffice.

But i'd still feed her up a bit ;) I prefer something a little more average :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom