Which X58 Mobo

Associate
Joined
23 Nov 2005
Posts
719
Location
Kingdom Of Fife
Upgrading my system to an i7 920 which mobo Intel Extreme Gigabyte or ASUS? What is the best tri-channel RAM for my new rig? Quite like the look of the G.skill perfect storm stuff! Will my Theramliright Ultra 120 extreme fit the 1366? with a new backplate?
 
Yes the TRUE fits the x58 and the general vibe is the extreme is a pimped up UD5 and not worth the extra.
As regards to the best no such thing juts research and research and make a informed choice ;)
 
Yes the TRUE fits the x58 and the general vibe is the extreme is a pimped up UD5 and not worth the extra.
As regards to the best no such thing juts research and research and make a informed choice ;)

Abit hard when the review sites contradict each other on results and seem to be soley obsessed with overclocking and how they play Crysis.
 
Abit hard when the review sites contradict each other on results and seem to be soley obsessed with overclocking and how they play Crysis.

Not really just means you didt read enough about them. If i made a post asking the question which is the best o/c gig x58 board very few will say UD3 most will say UD5/Extreme. Same if i ask whats the all out uber x58 best board for O/C most will say Asus rampage/EVGA...Asking for the best x58 and not giving any other info just means your to lazy to use the search fuction and tbh IMO is the worst thing on these forums that same questions daily ZZZzzz
 
Across my various systems I have ASUS P6T Vanilla, XFX X58, Gigabyte UD5, UD3 and Extreme and they all clock pretty much the same. I certainly wouldn't pay any extra for an Extreme over a UD5 as they are identical apart from the chipset cooling. If I was buying now I'd buy the cheapest, probably the UD3 or the P6T. The XFX has everything on it but the warranty isn't as good as the others.
 
Not really just means you didt read enough about them. If i made a post asking the question which is the best o/c gig x58 board very few will say UD3 most will say UD5/Extreme. Same if i ask whats the all out uber x58 best board for O/C most will say Asus rampage/EVGA...Asking for the best x58 and not giving any other info just means your to lazy to use the search fuction and tbh IMO is the worst thing on these forums that same questions daily ZZZzzz

The whole point of a chat forum is errrrrrrrrm to chat and discuss a subject is it not ?

If people don't question and discuss a subject to keep it up to date then what use would the seach function be ?

people that post " use search " or " try searching google " is just a lazy excuse to get your post count up.


.
 
Last edited:
Across my various systems I have ASUS P6T Vanilla, XFX X58, Gigabyte UD5, UD3 and Extreme and they all clock pretty much the same. I certainly wouldn't pay any extra for an Extreme over a UD5 as they are identical apart from the chipset cooling. If I was buying now I'd buy the cheapest, probably the UD3 or the P6T. The XFX has everything on it but the warranty isn't as good as the others.

I'm considering buying the XFX X58 board, If you were chosing between the Asus P6T and XFX which would you get? Also consider the £40 difference the XFX has :confused:
 
At that price point I would buy the UD3R which has a three year transferrable warranty, plus it will be far easier to sell than the XFX, which has no reputation (this aspect is very important to me as I change motherboards the way other people change shirts). Finally, the only person on here with an XFX is me, whereas loads of people have P6Ts and UD3Rs so it will be easier to get help if you run into trouble overclocking.

If cost is no object then UD5>P6T>UD3R>XFX

If cost is an issue then UD3R>P6T>XFX

Also bear in mind that the feature sets vary a little between these so if lots if features are important to you then the XFX would score higher.

If you want an unequivocal recommendation - UD3R.
 
Abit hard when the review sites contradict each other on results and seem to be soley obsessed with overclocking and how they play Crysis.

I think you have to bear in mind what market these reviewers are aiming at - anyone buying a £200 motherboard is highly likely to be interested in overclocking and speed. And generally, at any given price point, there is no difference whatsoever between a couple of motherboards in feature-sets, so the only way to say one is better than another is to establish how well it overclocks (and there are huge differences in this respect) and how fast it is with synthetic benchmarks such as Crysis.

Not really just means you didt read enough about them. If i made a post asking the question which is the best o/c gig x58 board very few will say UD3 most will say UD5/Extreme. Same if i ask whats the all out uber x58 best board for O/C most will say Asus rampage/EVGA...Asking for the best x58 and not giving any other info just means your to lazy to use the search fuction and tbh IMO is the worst thing on these forums that same questions daily ZZZzzz

I'm with both of you on this one. I absolutely despair of people who come on and say 'what motherboard' should I buy? But I still try and help them because they just want an answer to their question as fast as possible with the minimum of effort. And I like answering queries. That's a big part of what I get out of these forums. But most of the reviews are the same stuff over and over again. I reckon I probably spend 2-3 hours a week reading reviews. That's a huge amount of time if you think about it. I recently got an MSI P55 board and within 4 hours I reckon I had pretty much clocked it as hard as it was going to go. After that it was dull, dull, dull. Next! But now if someone has a query on the MSI P55, there is a decent chance I can help them. I can't/don't/won't get that from a review.

The whole point of a chat forum is errrrrrrrrm to chat and discuss a subject is it not ?

If people don't question and discuss a subject to keep it up to date then what use would the seach function be ?

people that post " use search " or " try searching google " is just a lazy excuse to get your post count up.

The whole point of a chat forum is to discuss stuff, but for regular contributors the whole 'What mobo to get' thing is a bit dull. There is a certain degree of laziness in posting these threads but I do despair of people who simply say 'I have £200 - what do I buy?' and then people just lump in and recommend what they have, not necessarily what's best for the OP. This thread is an excellent case in point. The OP asked about the UD5-Extreme and the top-end ASUS, but now he's at completely the other end of the market and trying to choose between the XFX or the ASUS P6T. [EDIT]Just noticed not the OP asking about XFX, point is the same though, the thread has evolved[/EDIT]

I'm enjoying the thread, and maybe BigBruiserAl needs to be a fraction more forgiving of the uninitiated?
 
Last edited:
The whole point of a chat forum is errrrrrrrrm to chat and discuss a subject is it not ?

If people don't question and discuss a subject to keep it up to date then what use would the seach function be ?

people that post " use search " or " try searching google " is just a lazy excuse to get your post count up.


.

I think you missed my point but was my bad example lol, yes these forums are for chatting 100% agree...but all of us on here are not paid and we come on for a chat , to help or to learn. Reding the same post which is the best XYZ when the question has been asked 5 times that very week is my point gets old very fast. Its the same peple on these boards trying to help out is it to much to ask for them not to read the same post every day :)

On topc though i agree with WJA96 with if cost is an issue then UD3R>P6T>XFX
:

dam to late typing what WJ said lol
 
If you want an unequivocal recommendation - UD3R.

The new revision of the UD3 is a fantastic board for the money - had it been revised sooner i would have saved friends some money and ordered this board instead of the UD5.

As you can tell WJA96 gets to punish a lot of boards/hardware, where as the rest of have to pick over reviews and forums – so his advice will be very informed. You can't beat independent recommendations from an enthusiast as magazine/site reviews can *sometimes* be slightly biased.
 
I'm sorry but i'll have to disagree.

Regardless if it's a budget item or an expensive item review sites should all test boards at stock settings and try and pick the bones of which one is the best either for stock performance or for it's feature sets as the manufacture designed it to be.And overclocking should be kept for review sites that specialise in overclocking as the results in overclocking is hard for anybody to reproduce even if they buy part for part exactly the same parts used in the test where as the tolerance at stock settings is more forgiving and difference in results is easier to cross check.

Topgear is very entertaining but would anybody really buy a car just based on how fast Stig can get it around their made up track when nobody would use a car like that for every day to day use. ? maybe some people like boy racers believe there own fantasy that they are getting much more than they really are.

:D


.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry but i'll have to disagree...

...but would anybody really buy a car just based on how fast Stig can get it around their made up track when nobody would use a car like that for every day to day use. ?
.

If that was directed at my post i agree with you.

As rereading my post i can see that I didn't express myself very well, I should have added after...

You can't beat independent recommendations from an enthusiast as magazine/site reviews can *sometimes* be slightly biased.

... and this information coupled/combined with other major reviews and user comments is always reassuring.

Agreed, you shouldn't blindly follow one person’s opinion - what i was really trying to say was, 'if the informed enthusiast's opinion is validating what has already been postulated in major reviews so much the better.'
 
Nothing aimed at you Plec just making conversation with my general opinion on review sites. :)

And i agree with you that review sites are biased as it's amazing how they can suddenly like a product if they get to keep the review sample.

.
 
Nothing aimed at you Plec just making conversation with my general opinion on review sites. :).

I've just looked back up the thread - a lot seems to have got said/posted before i made my original post @ 11.19 - i missed them. (my bad, as i had the 'post reply' screen open for quite some time before submitting my post as i was working at the same time - a bad habit of mine.)

Still, it was good to clarify my slightly mis-leading post and it's been interesting reading the conclusions of some of the other posts.

/Back on topic - what MB will you be opting for Jonnygrunge/Marley82?
 
I'm sorry but i'll have to disagree...

[snip]
...maybe some people like boy racers believe there own fantasy that they are getting much more than they really are.

You definitely have a point and the car analogy is a good one. In motherboards unfortunately the feature sets and chipset performance is often so close though that the only real way to differentiate between them is in overclocked form.

For example, if there is a difference between the UD5 and the UD5-Extreme then it's in the chipset cooling only and you're only going to see the benefit when you're really stressing the motherboard ie. when it's massively overclocked. It's slightly catch-22.

That's why many of us really only look at the last couple of pages in many reviews.

And ultimately you are quite correct, the boards should be thoroughly tested in stock form as well as overclocked.
 
Back
Top Bottom