• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

New nvidia GPU card launch October 30th

I've been holding out on a big upgrade for months waiting for the Next big Nvidia card (prefer drivers and support) but this is getting beyond a joke now. I'm getting very tempted to go with ATI or not bother upgrading at all seeing how PC gaming is looking pretty bleak atm :(
 
Why?

When you could put the extra down (which probably won't be much different) on a 295GTX... which will boost both rendering and physx performance :S
 
Greebo said:
Lets take votes on names shall we?

I reckon maybe "GTX275 Physx" but that's a bit lame.

Maybe "GTX 27550"?

But my favorite currently is "GTX320". They'll sell them by the boat load with that name ;)
Click to expand...

surely it has to be GTX295 and 3/4
 
Do i smell a EVGA GTX gtx 295.5 FTWPWNOWNZR1337 edition?
EG a 295 with a white stripe and a new graphics stencil on the shroud
 
What gets me about this is either a GTX260, GTX275 or a GXT285 *is* good enough to play games like batman or mirrors edge with PhysX support, or it isn't. Are they trying to tell us that you do need a separate card for physX?

When it comes down to it, no developer would be stupid enough to release a game that relied on PhysX because they automatically alienate all ATI users. This means that PhysX will always be just extra eye candy, and it has to work well on a single GTX260 or it isn't worth the effort.

I smell a massive fail here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom