both cars are front wheel drive eh![]()
I had to re-read his post after I saw him say that.
I've only really taken notice of this Scott/Tommy B guy after today's threads and he's annoying me already.
both cars are front wheel drive eh![]()
Now that looks quick from the interior cam, but the outside one....wow...just wow.

If he says Nissan GTR then I'm getting my best keyboard out.
both cars are FWD
for once I haven't said anything too ridiculous this time.
...for once I haven't said anything too ridiculous this time.
maximum speed with minimum fuss. amazing
boring
Would rather a GTR over that I'm afraid, Porsches do nothing for me at all
i wouldnt have thought 0-100 in 7 seconds would ever get boring lol
I'd rather have the Porsche, playstations do nothing for me at all.
Imagine taking your GTR to Tescos, you'd come back and find 14yr old boys rubbing themselves over your bonnet whereas with the Porsche you'd have supermodels wanting your babies.
* this might be a bit tongue in cheek for anyone that might not understand sarcasm

press a couple pedals, one to the floor and shove a lever. may as well be gran turismo, dont you think? compare that to trying to launch something like an f40 and youll see how gay 0-100 in 7s by pushing a couple buttons is

I like your sense of humour.
3.2s is absolutely savage though and makes sense given both cars are FWD and govern roughly the same power, weight difference aside. Anyway, I'll be credited for turning this into a classic VS battle, despite the fact everyone is thinking it.


Ouch! My bike can just about do 0-100 in around 8.5s! That's VERY quick.![]()
[TW]Fox;15184039 said:One of the most amusing things on the internet is people in comparatively naff old cars (Compared to a Porsche 997 Turbo you can include me in that as well before you start) banging on about how boring the latest supercars would be
'Yea yea yea 0-100 in 7 seconds and a 3.8 Turbo with 500bhp? YAWN!!!!!! I dont want one anyway'


You know that's 0-100 KMPH, not MPH right?