Vitali could handle it, he wanted to carry on fighting and was devestated when the fight was stopped.
What i really want to see is at some point in the future is Pacman vs Mayweather...
...then id love to see Pacman take Mayweather apart.

So did he break his hand?
He's on Sky Sports now being interviewed.
What a likeable fella.
It seems that Round12 is what is being talked about a lot. I've only watched Round12, so can't comment on the other rounds. But from what I can tell, Haye is constantly running away from Valuev. Yes, Haye caught Valuev and Valuev was rocked, but he had great recovery and stood up to Haye. In some instances what I noticed was that Haye was turning away, as he punched, which meant that he wasnt actually looking where he was punching (hit, hope and run strategy).
Some people are saying that had he not broken his hand, then he would've knocked out Valuev - I doubt it.
From what you guys say, most of the fight was like this: Valuev standing his ground, moving towards Haye, while Haye continuously hit a punch and then ran away.
I think Haye's next fight has to be more convincing as this certainly isn't the sort of performance you expect of a new champion.
It's been said over and over again, Haye couldn't really afford to stand in front of Valuev. The guy had 9 inch reach and 7 stone advantage over him, sure Haye was a lot quicker, but had a few of those BFG punches landed it would have been all over for Haye.
How else could you have fought Valuev? He had to get in and out and whilst his work rate wasn't that high, wasn't that due to his injury (has that been confirmed yet?)?
How can you comment on a fight that you didn't see? You really think he could adopt the same strategy against a quicker fighter and still win?
It's actually called a boxers break, so the doc told me..

It seems that Round12 is what is being talked about a lot. I've only watched Round12, so can't comment on the other rounds. But from what I can tell, Haye is constantly running away from Valuev. Yes, Haye caught Valuev and Valuev was rocked, but he had great recovery and stood up to Haye. In some instances what I noticed was that Haye was turning away, as he punched, which meant that he wasnt actually looking where he was punching (hit, hope and run strategy).
Some people are saying that had he not broken his hand, then he would've knocked out Valuev - I doubt it.
From what you guys say, most of the fight was like this: Valuev standing his ground, moving towards Haye, while Haye continuously hit a punch and then ran away.
I think Haye's next fight has to be more convincing as this certainly isn't the sort of performance you expect of a new champion.
What buffoon would stand toe to toe and trade off with a 315lb 7ft 2 Russian who's never ever been rocked let alone knocked out.. AND with a broken hand.. No-way should he have done anything differently. Besides, do you qualify walking forward and throwing punches into thin-air as winning? Valuev should have found a strategy to overcome the hit and dodge.. Since he didn't he lost.. Fair and square.

Before you comment I think you should watch the full fight, you sound silly otherwise.
Ruiz actually was closer to knocking down Valuev than Haye was. Valuev actually touched down but it wasn't ruled a knockdown
Vidoz wobbled him too or maybe it was Nobles. Bergeron shocked him but wasn't going to go over from that.
What kind of self-proclaimed boxing expert, who gave Haye barely any chance of victory, because he studies and reads up on this kind of thing don'tchaknow, doesn't even bother to actually watch the fight in question before basing his entire opinion on the last round and somebody else's reports of the rest?
Don't you get that anything written or said about the fight by other people will be inevitably skewed (mostly unintentionally, but still) slightly by their perspective? You're either just taking the opinion of what you've read elsewhere, or being contrary for the sake of it, because I really don't see how you can form an objective opinion of something you've not actually seen objectively.