What do you think ?

person · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:40

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1229393/Suri-looks-adorable-thats-heels-horrid.html

As above I personally just think this is so wrong she's 3 years old not 30 ! .. I don't care how " glamorous " her fool parents think it is its still wrong and so bad for her feet that will still be growing.

Biohazard · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:41

I think we should taser her into submission.

^TANK^ · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:42

Tacky as **** tbh.

Makunouchi · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:44

You can tell she's going to be hot...

Wait, what?

2StepSteve · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:45

That article has too much text

I am not gay or metro-sexual but I believe high heels damage feet quite badly.

Placing high heels on that American Freak will probably cause as much damage as being raised by the father, Tom Cruise.

Hmm then again I think it would be a better choice to ditch the father than the shoes!

Ziggy · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:47

Maybe she likes pretending to be grown-up and they let her do it for fun? Nah. :rolleyes:

Oh just noticed it's by Jan Moir of Gately fame. Heh.

tibbsey · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:47

Suri could be a dwarf chorus girl on her way to can-can rehearsals. Or an adult put through a boil wash.

loldailymail

Hades · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:48

Speaking as a parent, the girl probably just wanted to copy mum.

Although, to be honest, I'd have said no; but only because high heels are damaging to young feet.

jp_bl_68 · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:49

I don't think Jan Moir is in a position to question anyone's morals let alone the raising of someone else's child.

Vonhelmet · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:50

Ugh. Only ****** would put a 3 year old in heels.

^TANK^ · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:51

vonhelmet said:
Ugh. Only ****** would put a 3 year old in heels.

Or Scientologists.

Tunney · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:51

What do you think ?

I think that reading the Daily Mail is a waste of time.

Vonhelmet · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:53

^TANK^ said:
Or Scientologists.

***** scientologists. Truly a formidable combo.

person · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:55

Hades said:
Speaking as a parent, the girl probably just wanted to copy mum.

Although, to be honest, I'd have said no; but only because high heels are damaging to young feet.

Maybe this is true and its all very good and well to let her play dress up at home but not in the street .. the kind of image it portrays for a child of that age is just wrong. Plus it says at one point a shoe came off because she was struggleing to walk in them, there a hazard.

jp_bl_68 · 20 Nov 2009 at 00:57

It amazes me that any national newspaper can find the time to print this non-news. Was there nothing else happening today?

meghatronic · 20 Nov 2009 at 01:00

The Daily Mail has an odd obsession with that girl, she's always on there.

jp_bl_68 · 20 Nov 2009 at 01:01

meghatronic said:
The Daily Mail has an odd obsession with that girl, she's always on there.

If anyone else followed a child around and took pictures of them in high heels the Mail would brand them a paedo and round up a lynch mob.

^TANK^ · 20 Nov 2009 at 01:02

meghatronic said:
The Daily Mail has an odd obsession with that girl, she's always on there.

Maybe Gary Glitter is a silent partner

.

cheets64 · 20 Nov 2009 at 01:05

Whut, my niece has a pair of Disney plastic high heels, she even has some make up and puts it on but fails, its part of a girl growing up, she is only young, people need to stop being so submissive.

Redgie · 20 Nov 2009 at 01:11

The credit crunch and government expenses abuse took a break for this SHOCKING revelation regarding children's fashion.

I feel like writing to the Daily Mail with "Cool story bro.." But I doubt they'd appreciate the humour...

...but if they did, they'd probably print an article about it