Father executes his teenage son for sexually abusing his 3 year old sister

Nitefly said:
True, but his reaction was clearly the most extreme of extremes to say the least, and I think it's very easy to conclude the father was completely irrational.
Click to expand...

Oh yeah, totally. Regardless of whether it was the right choice or not, he made that choice in an unfit state of mind.

Whether people think its a terrible murder, or street justice. The kid is now dead, and like someone said, the little girl now has no father or brother.
Its tragic from every angle.
 
You've gotta question the parent.

Over reaction to say the least, there is something seriously wrong with a parent who is willing to kill their own child over something like this.
 
I wouldn't shoot my son, stick him in some kind of rehabilitation program and keep a close watch on him.
I'd stick the daughter into councilling as well as you don't know what a 3 year old will remember.

Save a sick **** while you have the chance.
 
Tummy said:
You've gotta question the parent.

Over reaction to say the least, there is something seriously wrong with a parent who is willing to kill their own child over something like this.
Click to expand...

Is your disagreement with the fact that:

a) a parent killed his own child
b) the crime wasn't serious enough to justify the reaction?

I could relate to (a), but I couldn't fathom what you would mean by (b).
 
kgi said:
Are there any stats available on pedo-rehabilitation successes? (serious question).
Click to expand...

No clue.

I do however like the fact that; something like 60+ % of convicted peado's are aged 17-32. Yet the media in this country paint a picture of the "overly" friendly old man. Which isn't true.

I also like how you're more likely to be hurt by someone in your own family then a random person.

The red top media would never say this though.
 
Tefal said:
he lay on top of his sister fully clothed, and decided himself he'd done something wrong so confessed and asked for help?


That counts as something terrible?
Click to expand...

Well if the teenager simulated sexual intercourse then of course it would be terrible and would need to get help. Depends on the actual circumstances that journalists can't be bothered to report. Why let the facts spoil a good headline.
 
kgi said:
Is your disagreement with the fact that:

a) a parent killed his own child
b) the crime wasn't serious enough to justify the reaction?

I could relate to (a), but I couldn't fathom what you would mean by (b).
Click to expand...

I would think it's very hard to take the life of your own child. I personally would never do it, I'd help my child.

No, the crime didn't justify the reaction.
 
Why is a 15 year old abusing his sister anyway? Maybe the father had fiddling fingers when the boy was young and didn't want anything coming out when the boy was questioned.
 
Tummy said:
No clue.

I do however like the fact that; something like 60+ % of convicted peado's are aged 17-32. Yet the media in this country paint a picture of the "overly" friendly old man. Which isn't true.

I also like how you're more likely to be hurt by someone in your own family then a random person.

The red top media would never say this though.
Click to expand...

These things don't excite the masses & require processing and perceptive abilities to filter through and understand.

The goal of most - if not all- printed press is to sell as many copies as possible per day, thus taint any story to spin it in a way that is more likely to make people want to buy. Based on that axiom you should discard anything tantalising or shocking displayed on newpaper covers as spin.
 
I think most people would say a pedo deserves to die, but when it's their own son would preach something different. This man however, kept to the 'pedos deserve to die' motto. Is it honourable that he made no exceptions for it being his son? I don't know what to think. It's just a sad story.
 
Last edited:
Deific said:
I think most people would say a pedo deserves to die, but when it's their own son would preach something different. This man however, kept to pedos deserve to die. Is it honorable that he made no exceptions for it being his son? I don't know what to think. It's just a sad story.
Click to expand...

There is nothing honourable in killing someone. There is nothing honourable in killing anyone based on a belief or idea. As B. Russell had said "I would never die for what I believe, because I might end up changing my mind" - or something along those lines.
 
Tummy said:
I would think it's very hard to take the life of your own child. I personally would never do it, I'd help my child.

No, the crime didn't justify the reaction.
Click to expand...

So you suggest that there could be a crime that justifys killing your child? But your child being an underage rapist is not enough?

I'm sorry but you have me confused.

If you don't agree with parents killing their children then the type/size of crime is irrelevant.

If you do agree, then I would question why you think having a teenager pedophile that rapes his own sister is something you do not deem serious enough excuse to shoot him.
 
kgi said:
There is nothing honourable in killing someone. There is nothing honourable in killing anyone based on a belief or idea. As B. Russell had said "I would never die for what I believe, because I might end up changing my mind" - or something along those lines.
Click to expand...

I never said there was honour in killing someone, but the fact that he made no exceptions in his belief just because the perpetrator was his son.
 
kgi said:
Or perhaps I should 'go back where I came from' ?
Click to expand...

What has this got to do with anything? :confused:

Stop making yourself look a tool.

kgi said:
These things don't excite the masses & require processing and perceptive abilities to filter through and understand.

The goal of most - if not all- printed press is to sell as many copies as possible per day, thus taint any story to spin it in a way that is more likely to make people want to buy. Based on that axiom you should discard anything tantalising or shocking displayed on newpaper covers as spin.
Click to expand...

I agree, that the press has to try and sell copies. They shouldn't do this at the sacrifice of journalism and truth.

The media have a huge say in what people think, the red tops have a target audiance and write and print stories in order to maintain them as readers.

I personally, don't believe much the media has to say and I find it even more laughable that people eat it up.

/back on topic.

The father has serious problems.
 
kgi said:
I don't know, somewhere between where you and Le_Petit_Lapin live as you show to concurr with his point of view. Or is it that you can't read?
Click to expand...

He didn't offer a point of view, he made a quip , I haven't concurred with anything, you're drawing conclusions based on nothing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom