Switzerland appears to have backed minaret ban

Though Islam is now a global religion, it is a valid point to mention that it always looks back to its roots, hence why the quran is only truly valid when read in arabic and why muslims always pray facing a certain direction.

The curious thing with the relative histories of religion is that Christianity was born into persecution, and lost it's way massively when it became a global power. Islam was born into conquest and war, and is now struggling with persecution, and finding it can't operate as it did when it started, because of the level of resistance that it understandably experiences.
 
It was nothing to do with Minarets at all.

It was racist voting, pure and simple.
Rubbish. It's about preserving the appearance of Switzerland.

All religions are tolerated there as indicated by the fact there are 150 mosques in a population of just 7m.

Mosques = fine.

Minarets = not fine.

Minarets are not compatible with Swiss culture. A million whinging leftys bleating "racism" won't change that.
 
Muslim countries have Churches. I see no need to just pick on Saudi Arabia out of all that.

Turkey has Churches. I think that's tolerance.

Saudi Arabia has no churches. Churches were already in Turkey when parts of it were under Christian rule centuries ago.

As such, I don't really care if they're funding Mosques.

I guess you don't care about the Saudi Wahabi money which funds extremist mosques in every part of the world and the terrorist training camps either. Saudi/Gulf State money is what keeps the whole thing going.

It was nothing to do with Minarets at all.

It was racist voting, pure and simple.

Islam isn't a race.
 
Saudi Arabia has no churches. Churches were already in Turkey when parts of it were under Christian rule centuries ago.

I'm going to be awkward and point out that the church is not just the building. I've attended churches that meet in all sorts of places, never mind just traditional church buildings.

That being said, I agree that Saudi Arabia does not have any concept of freedom of religion. It's ironic that we criticise a theocracy when many here would argue for the abolition of religion. Go go team hypocrisy.
 
No they haven't. George Bush wanted to go into Iraq for example, I doubt there were a bunch of Jews telling him to.

How wrong you are. Look at the Zionists in the Bush administration - Wolfowitz, Perle and co all push Israel's interests and wanted the US to go into the Middle East and take out Israel's enemies. The Israeli lobby is far reaching - why do you think the US always vetoes UN sanctions against Israel?

They won't tell you about this too much in the MSM - it's up to you to educate yourself and open your eyes.
 
I guess you don't care about the Saudi Wahabi money which funds extremist mosques in every part of the world and the terrorist training camps either. Saudi/Gulf State money is what keeps the whole thing going.

Yeah and the West's response? Invade Iraq.

Because that's dealing the problem. Most of the 9/11 hijackers were Saudi incidentally.

Also, although you may have missed it, I said I don't mind them funding Mosques. Don't then try to connect that straight to a desire to see more extremism.
 
Well, there is the fact that most Muslisms are brown,

Yeah but that would be like saying my intense dislike of rap music makes me racist because most rap musicians are black.

but it's still more xenophobia than racism.

Oh I agree, bigoted, xenophobic, intolerant, but not racist. There is a specific distinction in that (theoretically) you choose to be muslim and so criticism can be warranted.
 
It was nothing to do with Minarets at all.

I put it to you that if this was a vote on banning the building of new mosques, then the result would have been quite different. The fact that minarets are a symbol of Islamic dominance and "the bayonets of Islam" has everything to do with why the Swiss voted the way they did.
 
I put it to you that if this was a vote on banning the building of new mosques, then the result would have been quite different. The fact that minarets are a symbol of Islamic dominance and "the bayonets of Islam" has everything to do with why the Swiss voted the way they did.
Nail. head. Doesn't suit the fake "racist" chants though.
 
Yeah but that would be like saying my intense dislike of rap music makes me racist because most rap musicians are black.

No because that's not how it works. You don't dislike rap music because most rappers are black.

However, if someone dislikes Muslims because most of them are Arab/Asian, then yeah, I don't see why that isn't racist (xenophobic you've mentioned). There's a thread in SC with a video of a BNP member driving round Wembley clearly making racist remarks against Arabic Muslims.

Also I doubt most of the intolerance shown towards Jews throughout the centuries is because people have 'valid' criticisms of their faith.

Incidentally there are many examples of white people finding issues with rappers and hip hop culture in general because of their skin colour that go beyond just disliking some music.
 
I put it to you that if this was a vote on banning the building of new mosques, then the result would have been quite different. The fact that minarets are a symbol of Islamic dominance and "the bayonets of Islam" has everything to do with why the Swiss voted the way they did.
Irony of course being that minarets were built and promoted because they mimicked bell towers on Christian churches.

Wonder how long before mosques start sprouting 'air-conditioning towers' :p

Minarets also function as air conditioning mechanisms: as the sun heats the dome, air is drawn in through open windows then up and out of the minaret, thereby providing natural ventilation.
:D
 
YAlso, although you may have missed it, I said I don't mind them funding Mosques. Don't then try to connect that straight to a desire to see more extremism.

Well there's a direct connection. The Saudis aren't funding liberal mosques with nice friendly clerics who repect Christians etc. They are exporting Wahhabism (the strictest and most repressive Saudi form of Islam) through these mosques.
 
The curious thing with the relative histories of religion is that Christianity was born into persecution, and lost it's way massively when it became a global power. Islam was born into conquest and war, and is now struggling with persecution, and finding it can't operate as it did when it started, because of the level of resistance that it understandably experiences.

The BBC series "History of Christianity" is really very good - catch it on iPlayer if you're interested in such things. :)
 
Haven't we learned from history that tolerance, and letting people worship in the way they want to worship is the best way forward?

Nobody is hurting anyone... and I don't honestly see what the big deal is with minarets. When you start doing things like this, you start to make people harbour resentment. It's a very divisive policy.
 
Haven't we learned from history that tolerance, and letting people worship in the way they want to worship is the best way forward?

Nobody is hurting anyone... and I don't honestly see what the big deal is with minarets. When you start doing things like this, you start to make people harbour resentment. It's a very divisive policy.

The Swiss would harbour resentment if they let Muslims alter the appearance of their country. At the end of the day the Muslims are guests in Switzerland, they are fortunate to be allowed to live there, if they are unhappy they are free to go and live in a Muslim country aren't they?
 
In my opinion the Minarets do not fit in with the skyline of Switzerland. It's been said a few times in this thread that it's not Islam they voted against, it's the placement of the eyesores. Whether the buildings are an eyesore or not is down to opinion, but what can't be opinionated is the fact that Switzerland is not a Muslim country, so why should it adopt these types of features onto it's landscapes when they do not belong there.

It's not as if Switzerland have banned Mosques altogether, just the large towers that will impose on the buildings around it. It's funny how quick people are to play the race card when Islam isn't a race, and just because Islam isn't having everything it's own way for once people have to kick up a fuss.
 
If minarets can be constructed in such a way that they fit in better with the sky line, everything is a-ok?

If it's a planning/architectural issue, that would be the obvious solution, wouldn't it?
 
In my opinion that would be fine, say for instance, if the minaret was the same height as the mosque then that's fine, but I think you'll find that if that rule was put in place then the mosques would start to grow in height just out of being stubborn.
 
Back
Top Bottom