• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

ATI Radeon HD 5890 Coming in Q1 2010

Final8y

Final8y

Final8y

Soldato
Joined
7 May 2006
Posts
12,183
Location
London, Ealing
bheg.jpg

Replaced by increased clock speeds of the model considered as a faster version of the ATi Radeon HD 4890 introduced to the market, the truth was understood not so much te. Make some changes on the RV770 GPU, and as a result of these changes can increase the number of transistors AMD, high frequency to increase efficiency and 1GHz GPU speed was able to make it possible. Even some manufacturers such as Sapphire, GPU operating frequency for the first time in the industry card sales also began 1GHz'e extracted. ATi Radeon HD 4890 modelinden sonra AMD benzer bir adımı ATi Radeon HD 5000 serisi için de gündemine alabilir. ATI Radeon HD 4890 models after a similar step in AMD ATI Radeon HD 5000 series for the agenda may take.

ATI Radeon HD 5870 model has the industry's fastest single GPU solution, AMD ATI Radeon HD 5890 has a higher operating frequency model can be introduced. Company in front of any relevant official statement will not be, ATI Radeon HD 5000 series for GPU'larındaki overclocking performance often move to the agenda GPUs, AMD used a special election, the standard operating frequency for increased ATI Radeon HD 5890 model, a possible Nvidia GeFoce GTX 360 / 380 in response to attacks, during the months of January or February may offer users to the taste.

ATI Radeon HD 5890 claims related to other development enhances the AMD, Nvidia's GeForce GTX 380 competitor, the Radeon HD 5970'e opponent can not be considered.
Nvidia's new model with regard to any performance figures released so far has not been difficult to make a clear comparison.
On the other hand with GeForce 380-series change of the architecture and how a new structure will perform as yet unknown for the GT200 GPU and Cypress in front of GF100 code named Fermi-based next-generation GPU will take or how the location would be how fast a healthy to cut the power for the moment
Click to expand...
http://translate.google.com/transla...bir_kez_daha_gundemde-16991.htm&sl=auto&tl=en
 
doesnt it just **** you off that you always seem to be paying out with PC gaming! I should just stick to consoles! :(
 
Sound like the release of NVIDIAs new FERMI architecture is worrying AMD and has sent them panicking by drip feeding the market with smaller fabrications and higher clock speeds only months after their initial launch of the 5850/70.

Looks good though. 28nm should run cool enough for some decent overclocking results.. Not that you'll need it mind.
 
Gadge said:
doesnt it just **** you off that you always seem to be paying out with PC gaming! I should just stick to consoles! :(
Click to expand...


Not being funny, any decent hardware you have over the last three years is going to be playing games fine and will continue to do so for a while yet. So no need to panic.
 
I think by summer next year we are going to have some very interesting cards available as both AMD and NVIDIA will have stuff out and be competing pricewise.

5790 looks particularly interesting to me.
 
Locky said:
The 384 bit interface looks good to me.
Click to expand...

This. I am particularly interested in the 5890 and the 5990. I'll wait until next year now; once nvidia release the latest gpu's they have to offer the market a battle between the two will no doubt help to stabilise the prices somewhat.
 
kitch9 said:
28nm chip? Can't be right surely?

5790 looks an interesting card too.......
Click to expand...

Made by Globalfoundries? That's the only explanation I can come up with (other then an obvious typo) but I didn't think GF were starting production until 2012.
 
Last edited:
Don't understand why people think ATI are worried about Nvidia's Fermi architecture, because at the end of the day, ATI will always have the lower price factor, which means they'll sell more.
 
I find the quoted picture as a pure imagination of someone with a great fantasy.

1) if Globalfoundries would have 28nm process done, they wouldn't do their CPUs in 45nm process and wouldn't bother with TMSC 40nm process. If they will have it by end of next year or in 2011, call yourself lucky. 40nm process is what we will have next year. http://www.pcgameshardware.com/aid,698957/AMD/Ati-28-nm-Radeon-chips-from-Globalfoundries/News/
For 2010 Globalfoundries plans to start the 32 nanometer production - main customer will once again be AMD. In Q4 2010 the first 28 nanometer prototypes will be produced. Final products in this structure are not to be expected before 2011 but among them might be Ati graphics chips, that's at least what Globalfoundries hopes.
Click to expand...
2) 384 bit bus. Yes, right, and you know that one about ... :) . AMD and 384 bit bus with that core size is not going to happen.
3) The 5890 have less transistors, yet more shader cores ?

Sorry, but that whole picture looks like "Hm, make some nice numbers which will be quoted all around the world".

Those changes are way too big for a AMD half cycle (plus AMD half cycle is going to happen sometimes at end of Q2 2010/start of Q3 2010 - read june-august).
 
Last edited:
Admiral Huddy said:
Shame the games developers don't think so.
Click to expand...
Not sure what you mean by that. What does it have to do with game developers? If you're talking about the shortage of DX11 games then the reason for that is obvious. Nobody in their right mind is going to put a lot of money into developing for DX11 while 90% or more of their customers don't have the hardware to make use of it. The few that do are almost certainly getting paid large amounts of money by hardware manufacturers and/or Microsoft to showcase the new technology, just as happened with DX10 when it came out.

Eventually market penetration for DX11 hardware will be strong enough for game developers to start developing for it without being bankrolled, but you can't expect them to throw money down the drain just because they got a bit excited about a new technology.

And regarding the original post, that's a table from Wikipedia. Someone made a few guesses about the next round of cards, and now people are assuming it's genuine information. I somehow doubt it.
 
CBJ said:
Not sure what you mean by that. What does it have to do with game developers? If you're talking about the shortage of DX11 games then the reason for that is obvious. Nobody in their right mind is going to put a lot of money into developing for DX11 while 90% or more of their customers don't have the hardware to make use of it. The few that do are almost certainly getting paid large amounts of money by hardware manufacturers and/or Microsoft to showcase the new technology, just as happened with DX10 when it came out.

Eventually market penetration for DX11 hardware will be strong enough for game developers to start developing for it without being bankrolled, but you can't expect them to throw money down the drain just because they got a bit excited about a new technology.

And regarding the original post, that's a table from Wikipedia. Someone made a few guesses about the next round of cards, and now people are assuming it's genuine information. I somehow doubt it.
Click to expand...

This, it's still early days for DX11.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom