Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 5,060
- Location
- In the ether
Fair enough but don't make comments on ati hardware as you havn't owned it and are simply repeating things you see from other people without knowing if it's right or not or whether the people moaning are the cause of their own problems.
I agree to an extent. However, as an example a while back IBM had a series of hard drives, which where slated by tons of people I know (they ultimately got referred as the deathstars) for failing. Now if we're following your logic we'd have ignored these comments and bought one anyway.
The truth is people can, will and in some respects should base their hardware choices on what they hear, but of course should put more weight on what there own experiences are. I've never had an ATI card fail on me, and my problem is more with their drivers. But don't forget the vast majority of "spec me" threads on this forum are looking for peoples opinions on products they don't own. So this guy isn't really doing anything surprising.
My view is that ATI and NV cards aren't typically that far apart on performance, in fact I'd wager good money that if you put swapped out a 5870 with a GTX 295 without telling the owner only about 1 in 100 people would notice. In my view it's typically not the hardware itself that causes most problems for users, but the drivers and support offered. For example people are rightly disappointed with BFG going downhill as their support is oustanding (especially for RMAs), and (although this is heavily debated) I feel Nvidias drivers for Linux and their CUDA SDKs are frankly excellent compared to ATIs efforts on OpenCL and their Linux drivers.
.



