I used to own some Megaworks 550 speakers. These were rated at "500 Watt (Total) 75 Watt RMS (per satellite) 150 Watt RMS (Subwoofer)" I sold them on and moved to a Cambridge A1 and Mission M71. The M71 are rated "25 to 75 watts / channel amplifier" with the A1 rated at 30 wpc.
Why did they seem to be about 10 times louder than the megaworks? I could run the megaworks on 100% volume and they wernt that loud.
I now run a NAD C352 (80 wpc) and B&W 603 (120wpc) on 7 notches out of 21 they are stupidly loud.
Something doesnt stack up with the ratings between PC speakers and Hi-Fi gear. Surely if it was a 150watt sub and 5 * 75 watts RMS satellites the amp would need to be huge, about 20 kg and require huge heatsinks/vents/fans to keep it running. It used to run warm on the back but not hot. All the electronics were also packed into the sub
Why did they seem to be about 10 times louder than the megaworks? I could run the megaworks on 100% volume and they wernt that loud.
I now run a NAD C352 (80 wpc) and B&W 603 (120wpc) on 7 notches out of 21 they are stupidly loud.
Something doesnt stack up with the ratings between PC speakers and Hi-Fi gear. Surely if it was a 150watt sub and 5 * 75 watts RMS satellites the amp would need to be huge, about 20 kg and require huge heatsinks/vents/fans to keep it running. It used to run warm on the back but not hot. All the electronics were also packed into the sub
