-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
GTX 380 & GTX 360 Pictured + Specs
- Thread starter gurusan
- Start date
Probably...
I do wish people wouldn't buy 2x 295GTX tho... the lack of VRAM on them means they are useless at the resolutions where those 4 cores could be brought to bare... and at lower resolutions you simply don't need anything beyond a single 295GTX.
I do wish people wouldn't buy 2x 295GTX tho... the lack of VRAM on them means they are useless at the resolutions where those 4 cores could be brought to bare... and at lower resolutions you simply don't need anything beyond a single 295GTX.
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Jan 2007
- Posts
- 937
- Location
- West Sussex
If all you do is snipe at one another (funny comments aside) then this topic will get closed and the 'old bertha' the ban hammer might be used. Please keep to the wild speculation of the topic.
And through in the fact that I have seen 4 cores perform worse than 3 cores in some games plus you need a beast of a psu to run them and you need an i7 running at 5Ghz+ to not be cpu limited and it gets even more pointless and a waste of money.
Associate
- Joined
- 23 Mar 2007
- Posts
- 957
- Location
- Scottish Borders
Wow, listen to her.
yeah! she seems to be getting revved up about something! maby the trolltech pro firmware is running poorly?
This benchmarks are not fake.
http://www.techpowerup.com/110471/N..._Series_to_Clinch_Performance_Crown.html?cp=6
yeah... that proves they are not fake, the fact they said they were leaked....
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
Should have just said they were real then, as they beating the 5's in those slides
Nvidia just aint got a clue have they, they release some slides showing the Fermi's looking good by beating the 5's, and then they say they fake when asked about them, erm wtf, your cards are looking good, they beating the 5's, why say they fake, do you not want people to wait for them, or buy them when they out or what.
Last edited:
Should have just said they were real then, as they beating the 5's in those slides
Nvidia just aint got a clue have they, they release some slides showing the Fermi's looking good by beating the 5's, and then they say they fake when asked about them, erm wtf, your cards are looking good, they beating the 5's, why say they fake, do you not want people to wait for them, or buy them when they out or what.
Even Nvidia doesn't think people are stupid enough to believe one high end single-GPU card will best a high-end dual-GPU card from the same generation. How wrong they are.
You've clearly not learned enough cynicism when it comes to journalists svs22. 
Don't you think it would be a case of shooting themselves in the foot rather if they said the fake reports were accurate, but when the cards were released they didn't perform as well as the "leaked" data suggested?Nvidia just aint got a clue have they, they release some slides showing the Fermi's looking good by beating the 5's, and then they say they fake when asked about them, erm wtf, your cards are looking good, they beating the 5's, why say they fake, do you not want people to wait for them, or buy them when they out or what.
You've clearly not learned enough cynicism when it comes to journalists svs22.
He was the one who posted the benchmarks in the first place. In fact he removed one of them after it was revealed it had a typo on it.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 8 Jul 2003
- Posts
- 30,063
- Location
- In a house
You've clearly not learned enough cynicism when it comes to journalists svs22.
Don't you think it would be a case of shooting themselves in the foot rather if they said the fake reports were accurate, but when the cards were released they didn't perform as well as the "leaked" data suggested?
Yeah, at the minute everyones going woot, not buying ATi now, waiting for these baby's, so now Nvidia are saying, no please don't, these are fake, just go ATi, as once our cards come out with the real benchies, you'll see were slower than ATi's
yes, you do have a better card than me. doesn't make mine crap though. it performs perfectly well in all the games I play at 1920x1200 8xAA. just because I don't spend all my available money on cards doesn't mean I can't afford them. I can afford 2 5970s if I really want to buy them, but it's just a waste of money at the moment
Apparently you have 2x295's..enough said.
I'm on an nVidia thread, where the topic is the next gen cards. Your an ATI fanboy, that owns an ATI card, trolling an nVidia thread that really shouldnt apply to you. Yet your sitting there waiting for someone to mention the word nVidia so you can shout troll. I pick my kid up from day care and there's more maturity from those other 3 year olds.
Bye then, you look a complete troll
who acts like a child now? hmmmmm, really can't be done with trolls like this, I'm going to follow my own advice and ignore.
You're right, I shouldnt have said that about your card(s) and I have no doubt you can afford 2 5970's. After all you have an i7, oh wait a min, you have an x4
What's wrong with the x4?
I can easily afford an i7 system, but at the time I found they run to hot and I went for a cheaper solution that performs only slightly slower at high resolutions.
I fail to see how someone's cpu would determine if they can afford a graphics card.
Maybe he just doesn't have a need for an i7 system and would rather spend his money on something else.