Soldato
		
			
		
		- Joined
- 15 Nov 2008
- Posts
- 5,060
- Location
- In the ether
Thats why I used 99%.
The top 0.1% of company's probably can at a huge cost. But what about everyone that need to say.... move to new building ? or write off a whole up and running system thats had years of development before they could even consider a upgrade using huge parts.
For most it will not be a viable upgrade.
It is a viable option, look at Clearspeed their entire business is devoted to it:
http://www.clearspeed.com/
IIRC they even do rack mount setups now (NV that is) with 3xTeslas in them. So it's totally viable. Theres some massive improvements in the Fermi that makes it outstanding for CUDA work (error correcting memory, more flexibility in this SPUs do what, and the fact we can now write code in C++
 ). There will be a big move towards GPU's to accelerate scientific apps (and I mean even bigger than what is happening now) thanks to Fermi.  I wouldn't be in the least bit suprised if in two years time most of the top 100 super computers are using it.
). There will be a big move towards GPU's to accelerate scientific apps (and I mean even bigger than what is happening now) thanks to Fermi.  I wouldn't be in the least bit suprised if in two years time most of the top 100 super computers are using it. Then we get to business users, though it's more of a stream than a torrent at the moment big financial companies are seeing massive improvements in modeling techniques (MCMC for example) using CUDA enabled cards - so as soon as they're back up and running properly I'll expect NV to get a nice big revenue increase.
 
	 
  
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		
 
 
		 
 
		