Islamic protest march planned for Wootton Basset

For a start Christians as a whole do not follow Leviticus. Find me a passage in the New Testament saying "Put homosexuals to death" and you may then have a point.

Is there a passage in the new testament contradicting/revoking the law about gays in Leviticus?
 
Al-Qaeda plot to murder family of sniper soldier

British-based al-Qaeda fanatics threatened to kill a soldier’s family after learning his sniper team had killed 32 Taliban.

Armed police were sent to his home after anti-terrorism officers uncovered the plot to murder his parents.

The plans came to light when the security services monitored “chatter” – believed to be on mobile phones or the internet – between al-Qaeda extremists.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-st...der-family-of-sniper-soldier-115875-21937662/

:mad:
 
Is there a passage in the new testament contradicting/revoking the law about gays in Leviticus?

The general "wriggle room" argument is that Leviticus is specifically for the "Children of Israel" so only Jewish Christians need follow such harsh restrictions. :) It seems God got a bit nicer some 2000 years ago and stopped acting as such a git (other than throwing babies in to hellfire, but that is up for debate too).
 
Just wondering, this thread has reached 12 pages, we've now got news attention from both Sky and BBC. But does anyone know if this Mr Anjem Choudary is simply trying to stir up emotions and cause a commotion?

Or has he actually set a date for his march?
 
A far-right extremist who followed the same view as Nick Griffins brethren blew by the FBI building in Oklahoma.

McVeigh was a libertarian and claimed that the bombing was revenge for "what the U.S. government did at Waco and Ruby Ridge."
 
For a start Christians as a whole do not follow Leviticus. Find me a passage in the New Testament saying "Put homosexuals to death" and you may then have a point.




It doesn't however say "One male witness or failing that three women please" or "Hey, being a woman you inherit half of what a man does, tough luck" and it also doesn't say "Slap the wife if she misbehaves" (some paraphrasing may have occured...).

The problem is that the Bible has passages that can be interpreted quite widely whereas the Koran has some instructions which leave very little leeway (as well as some instructions which can be interpreted quite widely...). Also looking at the evolution of Islam it is a very different religion used from the very start as a control mechanism (whereas Christianity seemed to develop into one and then got better).






The point is that the bible does actually state the bits which God himself is saying, the Koran on the other hand is all God, all the time. Anything Mohammed said was from God and so had to be obeyed (handy that). I also quite like the "Oh, God said I am the last Prophet too, so no new stuff OK?"




That is the problem, while I see quite a bit about them denouncing terrorism and extremist groups such as this, I see very little coming from moderate muslims denouncing the actions of muslim "insurgents" in Afghanistan and Iraq. I have seen on this very board some moderate muslims pretty much try to excuse their actions and blame it all on the west. Or like some in this very thread just ignore it while decrying the Wests actions.



You think that the very different stances by the UN on the two issues are to do with media coverage? That would be to completely ignore the huge bias against Israel in the UN as a whole (as opposed to in the Security council where Israel has at least 1 veto on tap for the really tricky resolutions).



I think you are being very naive if you don't think that muslim nations and organisations are much more likely to turn a blind eye to aggression by muslims.



Most of what you are saying is your interpretation of Islam and Christianity. You assume muslims believe the Quran literally, which I disagree with. You assume Muslims beleive that putting Homosexuals to death is a widespread belief, when it is not. The bible give many quotes about beating, raping and stoning women not just the one given. I dont want to turn this into this quote, that quote.

You believe the majority of Muslims have a medieval view of their religion and Christians do not. I think this is false.

What the UN has got to do with media coverage of the wootton Basset denouncement by The BMC I have no idea.

I'm not naive about extremism or its effects, having witnessed what it can do in Bosnia, which with hindsight may bias me toward defence of Muslims, I dont know. I'm not saying they are more or less likely to turn a blind eye, but that all the religions are quilty of the same thing, Catholicism and the holocaust is an example. Overall, i think that separating the Islamic religion from the same expectations as the other main religions is going to cause more division and we could end up with another Bosnia at the extreme end of that.
 
Last edited:
When did Choudry do that?. Ideology. A far-right extremist who followed the same view as Nick Griffins brethren blew by the FBI building in Oklahoma.


He is with the extremists that do such things to children and he is a big fat extremist liar.

"One former friend said: 'I can't keep a straight face when I see "fundamentalist Muslim Anjem Choudary" in the papers attacking the British for drinking or having girlfriends"

"'When I knew him, he liked to be called Andy, would often smoke cannabis spliffs all day, and was proud of his ability to down a pint of cider in a couple of seconds"

"And the woman on the cover of the Mayfair pornographic magazine he is looking at is certainly not wearing a burka"

"'And he was ruthless with girls. When he briefly worked as an English teacher for foreign students in London, he'd pull one of them every few days, sleep with her, then move on to another"


What a dumb ass he is...lmao
 
Last edited:
He is with the extremists that do such things to children and he is a big fat extremist liar.

"One former friend said: 'I can't keep a straight face when I see "fundamentalist Muslim Anjem Choudary" in the papers attacking the British for drinking or having girlfriends"

"'When I knew him, he liked to be called Andy, would often smoke cannabis spliffs all day, and was proud of his ability to down a pint of cider in a couple of seconds"

"And the woman on the cover of the Mayfair pornographic magazine he is looking at is certainly not wearing a burka"

"'And he was ruthless with girls. When he briefly worked as an English teacher for foreign students in London, he'd pull one of them every few days, sleep with her, then move on to another"


What a dumb ass he is...lmao


I'm not advocating that he is a good guy, heaven forbid. I just think that all people with extreme views should be treated the same. Choudry didnt put a bomb on a twelve year old like someone mentioned, so why say it. That just inflames an already tense situation.

Like most extremists of any religion, or terrorists with any cause, most are just plain criminals who use others misfortune for their own gain.
 
Most of what you are saying is your interpretation of Islam and Christianity.

Of course it is, being agnostic I believe in neither. I am just putting my interpretation of things gained from experience rather than "what is said in the book".

You assume muslims believe the Quran literally, which I disagree with.

The Koran itself says it is the direct word of God. Muslims are banging on about how there is only one version of it (in Arabic) and how you have to read the arabic to really understand it. It would be hard to find a devout muslim (not an extremist) that doesn't consider the Koran to be the directly dictated word of God. However quite a few devout Christians will tell you the Bible is divinely inspired.

You assume Muslims beleive that putting Homosexuals to death is a widespread belief, when it is not.

Probably because in almost every country that Islam is in charge this is the case (or other very strict punishments are proscribed). Pretty much every muslim I have spoken to about the subject has been pretty homophobic and somewhat evasive about what should be done about homosexuality.


The bible give many quotes about beating, raping and stoning women not just the one given. I dont want to turn this into this quote, that quote.

The new testament however is somewhat gentler about the whole thing, must be God and his 2000 year old epiphany again...

You believe the majority of Muslims have a medieval view of their religion and Christians do not. I think this is false.

So what is the excuse for the vast majority of Islamic nations having pretty much a medieval justice system?

What the UN has got to do with media coverage of the wootton Basset denouncement by The BMC I have no idea.

Poor quoting on your behalf I believe. When you reply to my point about the UN being biased and muslims not condeming muslim atrocities with "I think that the problem lies with media coverage, rather than any actual denouncement." :)

I'm not naive about extremism or its effects, having witnessed what it can do in Bosnia, which with hindsight may bias me toward defence of Muslims, I dont know.

To be honest I think it might be the case. The sense of muslim brotherhood is both a blessing and a curse. It gives them a sense of unity but can make them blind to their own failings. Moreso than other religons. The reaction to Afghanistan and Iraq are a point in case, it is seen by many muslims (both moderate and extreme) as a "crusade" against Islam when religion has nothing to do with it.
 
The general "wriggle room" argument is that Leviticus is specifically for the "Children of Israel" so only Jewish Christians need follow such harsh restrictions. :) It seems God got a bit nicer some 2000 years ago and stopped acting as such a git (other than throwing babies in to hellfire, but that is up for debate too).


We have had various rewriting and reinterpretation of the Bible over the centuries, The Quran hasn't really been throught the same 'filtering'. there are groups who advocate re-interpretation of the Quran such as http://www.reformislam.org/
 
Compare and contrast this to the fuss made in the UN about Israel and the silence about the much greater scale of death in Darfur. And the utter silence (and sometimes denial) about the vast majority of deaths in Iraq and Afghanistan being done by muslims to muslims. It does seem that the muslim brotherhood only actually counts if the people getting killed are muslims and the people doing the killing are not.

Ban Ki moon begins by denouncing the violence in Iraq:
http://www.un.org/apps/sg/sgstats.asp?nid=2549

Palestinians and the UN on stopping honour killings:
http://www.stophonourkillings.com/?q=node/3248

Syria doing the same:
http://www.wluml.org/node/3490

UN on Algeria:
http://www.afrol.com/articles/30370

Western Media report on the whole only stories that they deem relevent to their readership, so a story on muslim condemnation of muslim atrrocities in a muslim nation isnt going to get the byline, when Israel and US are far more newsworthy as far as they are concerned.
 
So what is the excuse for the vast majority of Islamic nations having pretty much a medieval justice system?


Only Saudi and Iran have a complete sharia based legal system. The major Islamic states, Pakistan, Jordan, Indonesia,Turkey, Egypt have a secular constitution and legal system. India and The Phillipines have both. Most other Islamic law systems are based on english common law and elements of sharia.

So the vast majority of Muslims actually life under secular legal systems and not Sharia ones.
 
Last edited:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/wiltshire/8440408.stm

Johnson 'will back' Wootton Bassett Islamic march ban

Mr Choudary said he wanted to draw attention to Afghanistan's "occupation"

The home secretary has said he will back any request from police or local government to ban a radical Islamic group marching through Wootton Bassett.

Alan Johnson said he felt "revulsion" at the thought of Islam4UK's proposed march through the Wiltshire town.

Hopefully won't go ahead after all.
 
Back
Top Bottom