• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

TSMC back in full swing

Associate
Joined
10 Nov 2004
Posts
492
Location
Northampton
Sauce: TSMC: 40nm issues resolved

TSMC's Senior VP of Operations, Mark Liu, has mentioned that TSMC's troubled 40nm process is now of the same quality as the mature 65nm process. The chamber mismatch issue which dropped the yields of the HD 5800 series to a reported 40% have now been resolved, and yields are recently rumoured to be between 60% and 80%.

Mr. Liu did not delve into further details. Yield rates are a win-win-win situation for everyone involved. ATI will be able to ship more GPUs at lower manufacturing costs, customers will get widespread availability and lower prices.

Nvidia's much anticipated GF100 is also based on the same TSMC 40nm process. With constant rumours of disastrous yields, delays after delays, an improvement in the process is just what Nvidia needed.

Of course, these yield increases are reflected and evidenced by the sudden widespread availability of the HD 5800 series around the turn of the year.

Interestingly, volume production of 28nm products is all set for third quarter 2010. This is earlier than we would be expecting ATI's next-generation N. Islands, or perhaps even Nvidia's GF100 die shrink. Could those products be 28nm, skipping 32nm completely? It has also been suggested that ATI will have a 32nm Evergreen shrink before moving on to the next generation N. Islands. TSMC certainly seem to have made up for the disastrous 40nm process with 28nm entering volume production before schedule.

Apologies if this has been posted before or old news...

Hopefully some normality will be restored by the end of next month with stock readily available!
 
Stock has recovered in recent weeks.

Price has started to come down, but hopefully it will get even better now ;)
 
I'm fairly sure they said this about a month ago but where are the cards to prove it?

Of course, these yield increases are reflected and evidenced by the sudden widespread availability of the HD 5800 series around the turn of the year.

Lol, what widespread availability?!?
 
Last edited:
You have a good while to enjoy your 5*** series before DX11.1/12 rears its head.

End of 2010 for DX11.1 seems quite long considering most x.1 releases are normally 5-6 months after a major release.
 
Last edited:
Man, screw this gen of cards :p

I've put an MM ad looking for a GTX260-ish card, which should tide me over till all these nonsense yield issues get sorted and prices drop. Die shrinks ftmfw :D

Su
 
well at least the fact that tsmc are finally getting it together is good for everyone.
good news on the progress of the 28nm fabs aswell.
 
Last edited:
well at least the fact that tsmc are finally getting it together is good for everyone.
good news on the progress of the 28nm fabs aswell.

fabs built does not equal fabs up, running with a great process. TSMC haven't been on time with decent yields on a process for 4 years now, infact they've been the single worst fabrication company in terms of hitting anywhere near dates and having good yields.

As for the reports, its based on a post on another website, that has a picture of the man in question off TSMC's website, and no link, no qoute, no source, no nothing. They've taken a picture off the website and made up a quote at worst, at best the CEO of TSMC has said their yields are doing great, the same thing he's been saying now, for a year, and has been lying all that time aswell.

An OLD process now, being over a year old, with zero added technology will not just massively bump up in yields, it simply doesn't happen. A ramp from 60-80% in the first 6 months is possible, a ramp from 20-80% over the space of a year with no major improvements is not.

The stock increase is again based on part of the production line, being back online. Imagine there are 3 production lines in their 40nm fab, each can make 3k waifers a month, when a huge piece of machinary on one run broke they went down to 6k wafers a month total, instead of 9k a month, TSMC confirmed the fault and the numbers.

THe machinary was replaced mid december, the Plant can now make 9k wafers, instead of 6k, the yield per wafer hasn't increased. The only stock increase and increase of output was at the same time they re-established the 3rd production line.

This is another case of a very unimformed website drawing incorrect conclusions from the data available, that are blindly believing a CEO who says all is right. Did anyone believe Nvidia's CEO who said Fermi would be available in quantity on November 28th?

TSMC back in full swing, gives an idea where and what information they have, which is accurate, the plant is up to full production again, thats it.
 
Back
Top Bottom