Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Nov 2003
- Posts
- 36,747
- Location
- Southampton, UK
Another wonderfully and highly unbiased source there...
It's adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.
Two pictures and a video by the BNP? That's your evidence?
Well Dolph are you surprised that the only evidence he can come up with is from the BNP and 2 pictures that show immingrants/muslims at their worst.
Im pretty sure i can get a video and 2 pics that show British people at their worst as well.
It's not the Muslims we need to be scared of it's the fairies. They're EVERYWHERE!
The question is why should I have to face the consequences of other peoples actions, this maybe the same question you ask yourself really.
It's adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam: The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.
You refute people's personal experiences, posted here by other forum members.
You refute newspaper articles.
You refute photographic and video evidence.
What will you accept?
You refute people's personal experiences, posted here by other forum members.
You refute newspaper articles.
You refute photographic and video evidence.
What will you accept?
You refute people's personal experiences, posted here by other forum members.
You refute newspaper articles.
You refute photographic and video evidence.
What will you accept?
Such as? Please cite some, while remembering to compare like with like and ensure we are looking at causation not simply correlation...
Are white ghetto areas and muslim ghetto areas different in crime rates?
Are outsiders more likely to get attacked in muslim ghetto areas than white ghetto areas?
Should areas where english is not the primary language be considered all bad, including those homegrown ones?
What is the proportion of criminality by race between equivalent socio-economic groups?
By the way you speak of evidence, you should be able to answer all of these questions...
You refute people's personal experiences, posted here by other forum members.
You refute newspaper articles.
You refute photographic and video evidence.
What will you accept?
Personal experience? Yea, racial bias won't come into play at all
News Paper articles? Half your usual links have very little content and a lot of hysteria, argumentum ad hominem attacks and generally poor research. Just because the daily mail says so doesn't make it true.
Photographic and video evidence? Bias much?
Would that be Dr Peter Hammond the evangelical Christian, revered homophobe and general nutter?
DENIAL
Maybe you would prefer Robert Spencer.